Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: NGUYEN, JASON TOAN

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 3666

This examiner grants 55% of resolved cases

Analysis

NGUYEN, JASON TOAN operates within Tech Center 3600 and Art Unit 3666, where they have managed 29 resolved cases. This volume of cases indicates the examiner's level of experience in handling patent applications within this technology sector. The examiner maintains an allowance rate of 55.2 percent, which provides a baseline for the probability of securing a patent grant. This percentage suggests the likelihood that an application reaching a final disposition will be allowed. Practitioners can use this figure to gauge the general receptivity of the examiner to patentable subject matter.

The data shows an interview lift of 42.9 percent, indicating how direct communication correlates with the probability of success. The interview lift of 42.9 percent is lower than the 55.2 percent allowance rate, which helps determine the relative impact of verbal engagement. The median days to allowance stands at 859, providing a timeline expectation for the prosecution process from filing to grant. This duration reflects the typical pendency for successful applications. Understanding these metrics allows for a more informed strategy when navigating the examination process with this examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

55.2%
Allow Rate
+3.2% vs TC avg
61
Total Applications
+42.9%
Interview Lift
859
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 29 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

14.8%
§101 Eligibility
13.8%
§102 Novelty
47.8%
§103 Obviousness
21.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18890867 VEHICLE Final Rejection TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18497959 CURATION OF MAP DATA FOR CHANGED ROADWAY FEATURES Non-Final OA TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
19012378 INTERVENTION AND CORRECTION SCALING FOR USE IN STEER-BY-WIRE SYSTEMS Final Rejection Volvo Car Corporation
18185563 Method for Controlling Motor Assistance provided by a Motor of an Electric Bike Final Rejection Robert Bosch GmbH
18829204 APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR MONITORING MOVING VEHICLES Final Rejection GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
19161074 METHOD AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A VEHICLE OFF-ROAD Non-Final OA ZF Friedrichshafen AG
18573693 METHOD AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE Non-Final OA ZF Friedrichshafen AG
18896439 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING TRAFFIC SPEED Final Rejection Kia Corporation
18670131 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING CONTENT IN A VEHICLE Non-Final OA KIA CORPORATION
18409471 DRIVING SUPPORT METHOD AND DRIVING SUPPORT SYSTEM Non-Final OA KAWASAKI MOTORS, LTD.
18816964 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MEASURING POSITION OF VEHICLE Final Rejection HL Klemove Corp.
18472013 Map Message Sending Method and Apparatus Final Rejection Yinwang Intelligent Technologies Co., Ltd.
18120590 FLUID GROUND-ENGAGING TOOL ACTUATION SYSTEM Non-Final OA CNH Industrial America LLC

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month