Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 0 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Weiss Technik GmbH has 4 pending office actions currently under review. These actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners. The data indicates that there are 0 distinct art units associated with this portfolio's current activity. This suggests the matters are not yet assigned to a technical group at the office.
ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, each examiner is currently handling 1 action. The absence of recorded art units for these 4 pending office actions is a notable characteristic of the current prosecution data. The use of 0 distinct art units may reflect an administrative status for these filings.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (75%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R | 1 | 48.9% | +19.2% |
| SETZER, NICHOLAS LEE | 1 | 68.2% | +41.2% |
| OLAMIT, JUSTIN N | 1 | 62.0% | +9.4% |
| WHATLEY, BENJAMIN R | 1 | 66.7% | +68.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18987628 | TEST CHAMBER AND CONTROL METHOD | ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R | — |
| 18287519 | Temperature-Regulating Apparatus and Method For Producing Same | SETZER, NICHOLAS LEE | — |
| 18834868 | Test Chamber System and Method | OLAMIT, JUSTIN N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18987628 | TEST CHAMBER AND CONTROL METHOD | ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R | — |
| 18287519 | Temperature-Regulating Apparatus and Method For Producing Same | SETZER, NICHOLAS LEE | — |
| 18763022 | Test Chamber and Control Method | WHATLEY, BENJAMIN R | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18987628 | TEST CHAMBER AND CONTROL METHOD | ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 19, 2024 |
| 18287519 | Temperature-Regulating Apparatus and Method For Producing Same | SETZER, NICHOLAS LEE | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
| 18834868 | Test Chamber System and Method | OLAMIT, JUSTIN N | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 31, 2024 |
| 18763022 | Test Chamber and Control Method | WHATLEY, BENJAMIN R | — | §102§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial