Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days
Weka Io Ltd. currently faces 3 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, showing a complete lack of overlap in the personnel reviewing the company's intellectual property. This one to one ratio between pending matters and examiners suggests that the company cannot rely on a single examiner's familiarity with its core technology across different applications.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is NGUYEN, PHONG H, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the busiest examiner holds only a single action, the prosecution strategy must remain highly individualized for each filing. Practitioners should expect to navigate the specific preferences of 3 separate art units, which may result in varying timelines and examination rigor. The absence of examiner concentration means that successful outcomes in one application may not easily translate to others in the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON, JAYLUN ARMAN | 1 | — | — |
| PEACH, POLINA G | 1 | 50.3% | +23.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18539886 | Virtual File System Supporting Multi-Tiered Storage | PEACH, POLINA G | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2112 | 1 |
| 2165 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19059381 | Distributed Erasure Coded Virtual File System | JACKSON, JAYLUN ARMAN | 2112 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 21, 2025 |
| 18539886 | Virtual File System Supporting Multi-Tiered Storage | PEACH, POLINA G | 2165 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 14, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialWeka Io Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Jaylun Arman Jackson has the most, with 1 of Weka Io Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
