Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wexenergy LLC currently has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's current prosecution activity is split between different technical groups and individual officials at the USPTO, requiring a coordinated but flexible legal strategy.
AL-ASWAR, ZAKARIA KHALED is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. Since the total number of pending actions is 2, the workload is split between AL-ASWAR, ZAKARIA KHALED and one other examiner, with each handling 1 pending action. This balance means that no single examiner or art unit dominates the company's current pending docket, allowing for a variety of prosecution experiences.
The presence of 2 pending office actions in 2 distinct art units suggests that Wexenergy LLC is pursuing intellectual property across multiple specialized classifications. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 2 distinct sets of deadlines and examiner preferences. The focus on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems provides a broad technical context for these separate prosecution efforts, requiring consistent arguments across both active matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AL-ASWAR, ZAKARIA KHALED | 1 | 33.3% | +62.5% |
| GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 1 | 35.7% | +26.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18654478 | METHODS FOR INSTALLING A FRAMELESS SUPPLEMENTAL WINDOW FOR FENESTRATION | AL-ASWAR, ZAKARIA KHALED | 46d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18029827 | FRAMELESS SUPPLEMENTAL WINDOW FOR FENESTRATION | GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 481d overdue |
| 18654478 | METHODS FOR INSTALLING A FRAMELESS SUPPLEMENTAL WINDOW FOR FENESTRATION | AL-ASWAR, ZAKARIA KHALED | 46d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| 3633 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18654478 | METHODS FOR INSTALLING A FRAMELESS SUPPLEMENTAL WINDOW FOR FENESTRATION | AL-ASWAR, ZAKARIA KHALED | 3635 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 46d overdue | Pending | May 03, 2024 |
| 18029827 | FRAMELESS SUPPLEMENTAL WINDOW FOR FENESTRATION | GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 3633 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 481d overdue | Pending | Mar 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial