Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Willand (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Willand (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd. is managing 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 4 distinct art units, indicating that the company's technology is being evaluated from several different mechanical and e-commerce perspectives. The portfolio is handled by 4 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is under the review of a different individual.

YOON, JANE SUJIN is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, though they only have 1 pending case. This distribution shows that no single examiner has a dominant influence over the company's 4 pending office actions. Practitioners must manage four separate relationships across 4 distinct art units, which requires a broad understanding of various examination practices within the USPTO.

Because each of the 4 pending office actions is assigned to a unique examiner, the company faces a variety of examination styles. This lack of concentration means that a successful outcome in one case may not necessarily predict success in another, as each of the 4 distinct examiners will apply their own interpretation of the prior art. The art units involved suggest a diverse classification of the company's mechanical innovations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
YOON, JANE SUJIN 1 54.6% +30.4%
CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT 1 66.5% +48.9%
CHOI, JISUN 1 65.8% +59.7%
BEAN, JARED C 1 63.0% +42.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18320345 METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING BOUNDARY OF WORKING AREA OF LAWNMOWER, METHOD FOR MOWING AND LAWNMOWER CHOI, JISUN 17d overdue
18149358 AUTONOMOUS MOBILE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAME BEAN, JARED C 19d
18586242 MOWING CONTROL METHOD, SETTING METHOD, LAWN MOWER, SETTING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT 56d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18320345 METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING BOUNDARY OF WORKING AREA OF LAWNMOWER, METHOD FOR MOWING AND LAWNMOWER CHOI, JISUN 17d overdue
18149358 AUTONOMOUS MOBILE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAME BEAN, JARED C 19d
18586242 MOWING CONTROL METHOD, SETTING METHOD, LAWN MOWER, SETTING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT 56d
35526611 Global positioning device for lawn mower YOON, JANE SUJIN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2951 1
3663 1
3666 1
3669 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
35526611 Global positioning device for lawn mower YOON, JANE SUJIN 2951 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18586242 MOWING CONTROL METHOD, SETTING METHOD, LAWN MOWER, SETTING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT 3663 §101§103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Feb 23, 2024
18320345 METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING BOUNDARY OF WORKING AREA OF LAWNMOWER, METHOD FOR MOWING AND LAWNMOWER CHOI, JISUN 3666 §103§112 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending May 19, 2023
18149358 AUTONOMOUS MOBILE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAME BEAN, JARED C 3669 §103§112 Final Rejection 19d Pending Jan 03, 2023

Managing Willand (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month