Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Willo Products Company LLC currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution activity is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a focus for their mechanical and e-commerce intellectual property. Practitioners should note that this concentration in 1 art unit leads to consistent examiner behavior and predictable legal standards for the pending matters.
The portfolio involves 2 distinct examiners, indicating that each pending action is being handled by a different individual. AHMAD, FARIA F is identified as the busiest examiner for this company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This distribution shows that the workload is divided among the 2 distinct examiners. For the applicant, this means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to the styles of the different individuals, even though the technology remains within 1 art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AHMAD, FARIA F | 1 | 76.7% | +8.4% |
| BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | 1 | 67.4% | +26.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19193115 | Door Latch System | BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19294639 | Tamper-Resistant Locking System and Method | AHMAD, FARIA F | 3675 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 08, 2025 |
| 19193115 | Door Latch System | BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | — | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial