Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Woodcomposite Sweden AB

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Woodcomposite Sweden AB has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit and a distinct examiner. NERANGIS, VICKEY M is the busiest examiner for the company, currently responsible for the pending action. The company's current patent strategy is focused on a particular examiner within a specific technical field.

The focus on the Chemistry & Materials sector indicates that the company's current intellectual property efforts are concentrated on material science or chemical processes. With only a distinct examiner involved, the company can develop a very specific rapport and understanding of the examiner's expectations. This centralized prosecution model reduces the complexity often found in larger portfolios with multiple pending actions. Practitioners should leverage this direct relationship to address any technical rejections efficiently within the particular art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NERANGIS, VICKEY M 2 56.6% +29.0%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18675357 CELLULOSIC COMPOSITE NERANGIS, VICKEY M 33d
18675209 CELLULOSIC COMPOSITE NERANGIS, VICKEY M 75d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1763 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18675209 CELLULOSIC COMPOSITE NERANGIS, VICKEY M 1763 §103 Non-Final OA 75d Pending May 28, 2024
18675357 CELLULOSIC COMPOSITE NERANGIS, VICKEY M 1763 §103Other Non-Final OA 33d Pending May 28, 2024

Managing Woodcomposite Sweden AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month