Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd. has a distributed patent prosecution profile in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The company currently has 4 pending office actions, which are spread across 4 distinct art units. This indicates that the company's display technologies are being evaluated by multiple specialized groups within the USPTO's semiconductor and optics divisions. The use of 4 distinct art units suggests a broad technical scope for the company's current filings.

The prosecution of these applications is handled by 4 distinct examiners, with each examiner managing a single active matter. ELLIOTT, DANIEL KURT is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This decentralized structure means that the company must interact with 4 distinct examiners, each with their own examination style and technical focus. Managing 4 pending office actions in this manner requires a coordinated effort to ensure that the company's intellectual property strategy remains consistent.

Practitioners must tailor their responses to the specific requirements of 4 distinct examiners while navigating the nuances of four different technical groups. This distribution within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field provides the company with a broad exposure to USPTO examination practices. With 1 busiest examiner pending for ELLIOTT, DANIEL KURT, the workload is evenly spread across the assigned staff. This lack of concentration across the 4 distinct art units involved requires a multifaceted approach to the company's current patent prosecution cycle.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ELLIOTT, DANIEL KURT 1 — —
PETERSON, ERIK T 1 76.4% +10.5%
PHAM, THANHHA S 1 85.4% +4.8%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18832117 LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE CHIP, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY ELLIOTT, DANIEL KURT —
18436050 DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF PETERSON, ERIK T —
18429625 CHIP-ON-FILM STRUCTURE, DISPLAY DEVICE AND SPLICED DISPLAY DEVICE PHAM, THANHHA S —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18436050 DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF PETERSON, ERIK T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2899 1
2898 1
2812 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18832117 LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE CHIP, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY ELLIOTT, DANIEL KURT 2899 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 23, 2024
18436050 DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF PETERSON, ERIK T 2898 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 08, 2024
18429625 CHIP-ON-FILM STRUCTURE, DISPLAY DEVICE AND SPLICED DISPLAY DEVICE PHAM, THANHHA S 2812 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 01, 2024

Managing Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd. have?

Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd. applications?

Daniel Kurt Elliott has the most, with 1 of Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Xiamen Extremely Pq Display Technology Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month