Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Xmyth Ip Group Limited is currently prosecuting patents in the Communications technology area. The company has 1 pending office action under review. This prosecution is being managed by 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specialized technical application within the communications field.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is EDWARDS, MARK, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. Since this is the only pending office action for the company, this examiner is the sole point of contact for the company's current patent applications. The outcome of the company's current patent strategy is tied directly to the review conducted by this examiner.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner simplifies the administrative burden of the portfolio. Practitioners do not have to manage diverse examiner behaviors or varying art unit standards. This 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current interaction with the patent office in the Communications sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDWARDS, MARK | 1 | 76.3% | +13.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18149684 | Touch sensing circuit | EDWARDS, MARK | 161d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18149684 | Touch sensing circuit | EDWARDS, MARK | 161d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18149684 | Touch sensing circuit | EDWARDS, MARK | 2624 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 161d overdue | Pending | Jan 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial