Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Xoltar Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Xoltar Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio's current activity is restricted to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a specific and localized prosecution effort at the present time. The company can focus its intellectual property strategy on the nuances of this single examination group without the complexity of managing multiple pending cases.

TIMOTHY A MUSSELMAN serves as the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This specific examiner handles the current workload that constitutes the entirety of the 1 pending office action before the patent office. Because the prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit, the applicant can focus on the specific procedural standards of that department. Success in this matter depends on understanding the specific examination style of this individual and the precedents established within their particular technical group.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A 1 58.2% +25.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18594685 ARTIFICIAL CONVERSATION EXPERIENCE MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A 28d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18594685 ARTIFICIAL CONVERSATION EXPERIENCE MUSSELMAN, TIMOTHY A 3715 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Mar 04, 2024

Managing Xoltar Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month