Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Yu Mi Lee

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Yu Mi Lee currently has 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ALAM, MOHAMMED, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This single pending matter represents the entirety of the current active prosecution for this individual, with all feedback coming from one examiner.

Because there are 0 distinct art units listed, the administrative classification of this matter is unique within the dataset. Practitioners must focus exclusively on the preferences of ALAM, MOHAMMED to advance this case. The lack of multiple pending actions or examiners means there is no internal baseline for comparing prosecution success or examiner behavior. This individual's strategy is currently tied to the resolution of this 1 pending office action. The outcome of this single case will define the current success of the patenting effort, making the interaction with the 1 distinct examiner the central element of the prosecution process.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALAM, MOHAMMED 1 92.2% +6.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18436507 DESIGN METHOD AND DESIGN SYSTEM FOR PLACING AND ROUTING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES ALAM, MOHAMMED —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18436507 DESIGN METHOD AND DESIGN SYSTEM FOR PLACING AND ROUTING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES ALAM, MOHAMMED — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 08, 2024

Managing Yu Mi Lee's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Yu Mi Lee have?

Yu Mi Lee has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 0 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Yu Mi Lee applications?

Mohammed Alam has the most, with 1 of Yu Mi Lee's pending office actions.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month