Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Zenseact AB

11 pending office actions • 8 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

8
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (8)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
11
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only10 (91%)
§102 only1 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
9% of docket
1
Semiconductors
9% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
82% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
THOMPSON, JOSEPH LEIGH 1 18.2% +50.0%
SHAAWAT, MUSSA A 1 76.3% +6.2%
LEE, TYLER J 1 92.0% +6.8%
BUSE, TERRY C 1 59.8% +23.3%
ORANGE, DAVID BENJAMIN 1 33.8% +30.8%
CHEN, PATRICK C 1 82.2% +9.5%
TURNBAUGH, ASHLEIGH NICOLE 1 49.1% +9.1%
SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J 1 47.1% +9.3%
ALSOMAIRY, IBRAHIM ABDOALATIF 1 41.9% +10.5%
LEVY, MERRITT E 1 33.7% +34.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18897429 STREETLIGHT BLOCKS ENHANCED ADAPTIVE HIGH BEAM CONTROL LEE, TYLER J 8d overdue
18531062 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR ADAPTIVE HIGH BEAM CONTROL FOR A VEHICLE CHEN, PATRICK C 82d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18991530 METHOD FOR PROVIDING A FREE-SPACE ESTIMATION WITH MOTION DATA THOMPSON, JOSEPH LEIGH 34d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17947455 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM FEATURES OR FUNCTIONS LEVY, MERRITT E 89d overdue
17947441 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM FEATURES ALSOMAIRY, IBRAHIM ABDOALATIF 72d overdue
18396315 CLASSIFICATION OF OBJECTS PRESENT ON A ROAD ORANGE, DAVID BENJAMIN 37d overdue
18621667 VEHICLE LOCALIZATION BUSE, TERRY C 28d overdue
18991530 METHOD FOR PROVIDING A FREE-SPACE ESTIMATION WITH MOTION DATA THOMPSON, JOSEPH LEIGH 34d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3666 3
3667 2
3665 1
3669 1
3663 1
2663 1
2842 1
3662 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18991530 METHOD FOR PROVIDING A FREE-SPACE ESTIMATION WITH MOTION DATA THOMPSON, JOSEPH LEIGH 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Dec 21, 2024
18988784 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SETTING DYNAMIC TRIGGERS FOR EVENT RECORDINGS FOR A VEHICLE SHAAWAT, MUSSA A 3669 §102 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Dec 19, 2024
18897429 STREETLIGHT BLOCKS ENHANCED ADAPTIVE HIGH BEAM CONTROL LEE, TYLER J 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Sep 26, 2024
18621667 VEHICLE LOCALIZATION BUSE, TERRY C 3666 §103 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Mar 29, 2024
18396315 CLASSIFICATION OF OBJECTS PRESENT ON A ROAD ORANGE, DAVID BENJAMIN 2663 §103 Non-Final OA 37d overdue Pending Dec 26, 2023
18531062 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR ADAPTIVE HIGH BEAM CONTROL FOR A VEHICLE CHEN, PATRICK C 2842 §103 Final Rejection 82d Pending Dec 06, 2023
18178730 DYNAMIC ADJUSTMENT OF AN EVENT SEGMENT LENGTH OF A VEHICLE EVENT RECORDING BUFFER TURNBAUGH, ASHLEIGH NICOLE 3667 §103 Final Rejection 195d overdue Pending Mar 06, 2023
17972926 ADS PERCEPTION SYSTEM PERCEIVED FREE-SPACE VERIFICATION SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J 3662 §103 Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending Oct 25, 2022
17947441 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM FEATURES ALSOMAIRY, IBRAHIM ABDOALATIF 3667 §103 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Sep 19, 2022
17947455 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM FEATURES OR FUNCTIONS LEVY, MERRITT E 3666 §103 Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending Sep 19, 2022
17892226 VALIDATION OF SURROUNDING OBJECTS PERCIEVED BY AN ADS-EQUIPPED VEHICLE AFRIN, NAZIA 3666 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2022

Managing Zenseact AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month