Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
ZF Passive Safety Systems US Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The company's current activity is limited to 1 pending office action, indicating a highly specific prosecution phase. Because the work is confined to 1 distinct art unit, the examiner's familiarity with mechanical safety systems will be critical to the outcome.
ERMIA EMAD MELIKA is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This examiner is the sole point of contact for the company's current pending matters at the USPTO. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of ERMIA EMAD MELIKA to navigate the prosecution successfully. The involvement of only 1 distinct examiner allows for a direct and focused response strategy.
The 1 pending office action suggests that the company is currently maintaining a lean US patent portfolio. By operating within 1 distinct art unit, the company can align its technical descriptions with the specific expectations of that unit. This centralized approach minimizes administrative complexity and allows for a dedicated effort to secure this patent in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. ERMIA EMAD MELIKA will provide the primary feedback for this active matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD | 1 | 63.4% | +27.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18495813 | SEATBELT RETRACTOR | MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD | 155d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18495813 | SEATBELT RETRACTOR | MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD | 155d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18495813 | SEATBELT RETRACTOR | MELIKA, ERMIA EMAD | 3654 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 155d overdue | Pending | Oct 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial