Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Yogesh C Garg, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as GARG, YOGESH C

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 3625 3688

This examiner grants 62% of resolved cases

Analysis

GARG, YOGESH C works in USPTO tech center 3600 and art unit 3625. The profile includes 768 resolved cases, a 61.7% allowance rate, and a median of 1111 days to allowance. Interviews correspond to a 33.4% lift, making interview practice an important consideration for applicants evaluating how to address outstanding issues.

The listed companies are Capital One Services LLC, Nike Inc., and Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. The listed firms are Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Barnes & Thornburg LLP (IN), and BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP. The 1111-day median favors early docket management, while the allowance and interview figures support a deliberate combination of written and oral advocacy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

61.7%
Allow Rate
+9.7% vs TC avg
811
Total Applications
+33.4%
Interview Lift
1111
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 768 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

32.5%
§101 Eligibility
8.9%
§102 Novelty
26.5%
§103 Obviousness
21.4%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19211518 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECOMMENDED SORTING OF SEARCH RESULTS FOR ONLINE SEARCHING Non-Final OA Capital One Services, LLC
18544496 DATABASE MANAGEMENT FOR STORED VALUE MEDIUMS Final Rejection Capital One Services, LLC
19252526 Asset Unlocking Using Augmented Reality Non-Final OA NIKE, Inc.
19063146 RECOMMENDATION METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS Non-Final OA HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
18754236 MOBILE OBJECT BROKERAGE SYSTEM AND MOBILE OBJECT BROKERAGE METHOD Final Rejection HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
18451773 NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE Final Rejection Fujitsu Limited
18861382 INFORMATION DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Non-Final OA Beijing Youzhuju Network Technology Co., Ltd.
18811577 Different Action User-Interface Components In A Comparison View Final Rejection eBay Inc.
19178560 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAKING CONTENT-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS USING A USER PROFILE LIKELIHOOD MODEL Non-Final OA PayPal, Inc.
18444498 SELECTING REPLACEMENT ITEMS FOR AN ORDER BASED ON MACHINE-LEARNED PREDICTIONS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EVENTS Final Rejection Maplebear Inc.
19025836 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRIORITIZING INFORMATION ITEMS FOR THIRD-PARTY PRESENTATION Final Rejection Walmart Apollo, LLC

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Yogesh C Garg's allowance rate?

61.7% of resolved applications examined by Yogesh C Garg were allowed (768 resolved cases), compared with 32.9% across Art Unit 3625 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Yogesh C Garg?

This examiner's interview lift is +33.4 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Yogesh C Garg take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Yogesh C Garg took 1,111 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Yogesh C Garg work in?

Yogesh C Garg examines applications in Art Unit 3625 in Tech Center 3600 (Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month