Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Clint V Pham, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as PHAM, CLINT V

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 3661 3663

This examiner grants 45% of resolved cases

Analysis

Clint V. Pham manages Art Unit 3661 with 76 resolved cases and an allowance rate of 44.7 percent. The median days to allowance is 1163, which is the timeframe automotive companies like Toyota Motor Corporation, Volvo Group, and Kia Corporation can expect for successful outcomes. This moderate allowance rate suggests a thorough examination process in Tech Center 3600 that requires careful attention to detail.

An interview lift of 22.7 percent indicates that direct engagement is an effective strategy for improving the 44.7 percent base allowance rate. This lift suggests that many technical issues can be resolved through discussion rather than repeated written filings. Firms such as DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP, AMIN, TUROCY & WATSON, LLP, and ANDRUS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, LLP should consider the 1163-day median as they integrate interviews into their prosecution plans. The data supports the use of verbal advocacy to overcome rejections.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

44.7%
Allow Rate
-7.3% vs TC avg
117
Total Applications
+22.7%
Interview Lift
1163
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 76 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

12.2%
§101 Eligibility
28.2%
§102 Novelty
46.5%
§103 Obviousness
11.8%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19476446 METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA IN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING SAME Non-Final OA LG Electronics Inc.
17533310 REAL-TIME SURFACE SCANNING AND ESTIMATION OF GROUND CHARACTERISTICS FOR GROUND COMPACTING WORK MACHINES Final Rejection Deere & Company
19186810 PASSENGER EXPERIENCE OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM, PASSENGER EXPERIENCE OPTIMIZATION METHOD, PASSENGER EXPERIENCE OPTIMIZATION DEVICE Final Rejection TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
19073162 DRIVER ASSIST APPARATUS, DRIVER ASSIST METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM Final Rejection TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
19062714 VEHICLE Final Rejection TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
19167105 FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE FUEL CELL SYSTEM Non-Final OA VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
19257966 A CONTROL UNIT AND METHOD THEREIN FOR DETECTING CHANGES IN OPERATION OF A POWERTRAIN OF A HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE Non-Final OA VOLVO PENTA CORPORATION
19059614 DETERMINATION DEVICE, DETERMINATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Final Rejection HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
18842758 Method and Apparatus for Outputting Information to a User of a Means of Transportation Final Rejection Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
18031184 Vehicle Control System and Method for Operating a Driving Function in the Event of a Change in Configuration Final Rejection Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
18955793 MOTOR DRIVING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME Final Rejection KIA CORPORATION
18651169 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT A REGENERATION PROCESS OF A PARTICULATE FILTER OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, A MOTOR VEHICLE, AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM Non-Final OA KIA CORPORATION
18675763 DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING DISPLAY CONTROL PROGRAM Non-Final OA Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
19138812 METHOD FOR DETECTING ROADWORKS IN A VEHICLE Final Rejection DAIMLER TRUCK AG
19152222 METHOD FOR DETERMINING WHETHER TO HEAT OR COOL A SURFACE Non-Final OA GENTHERM INCORPORATED

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Clint V Pham's allowance rate?

44.7% of resolved applications examined by Clint V Pham were allowed (76 resolved cases), compared with 77.3% across Art Unit 3661 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Clint V Pham?

This examiner's interview lift is +22.7 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Clint V Pham take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Clint V Pham took 1,163 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Clint V Pham work in?

Clint V Pham examines applications in Art Unit 3661 in Tech Center 3600 (Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month