Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 11 clients • 13 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. focuses on Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and has 12 pending office actions. Its prosecution record includes 1387 career applications, supplying a substantial base for interpreting the reported results.

The resolved allowance rate is 87.75%, and applications reaching allowance have averaged 2.92 office actions. The profile indicates favorable resolved outcomes with successful applications generally requiring multiple stages of examination and response.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1387 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1387
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1387
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=716
-0.46σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=716
958 days
Time to Allowance
n=716
+3.7pp
Interview Lift
n=1387
25.9%
RCE Rate
n=1387
1.7%
Appeal Rate
n=1387

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

76.4%
§101 Overcome
n=72
73.3%
§102 Overcome
n=288
76.6%
§103 Overcome
n=414
80.4%
§112 Overcome
n=402

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61B, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1387
3
Practitioners
n=1387
462.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=1387

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (77%)
1
Medium (8%)
2
Easy (15%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (31%)
§103 only1 (8%)
§112 only2 (15%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (46%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
62% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
31% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ORTIZ, ADAM C 1 65.8% +34.7%
CHANG, OLIVIA C 1 84.6% +13.1%
MORALES, JON ERIC C 1 85.4% +10.0%
CORNELIUS, CLAIRE ADRIENNE 1 71.4% +0.0%
STIGELL, THEODORE J 1 78.3% +14.8%
YU, TIAN NMN 1 55.6% +19.3%
BOECKELMAN, JACOB A 1 34.9% +46.5%
PIHONAK, SARAH 1 61.4% +42.4%
LING, DORIS 1 25.0% +27.3%
WALTERS JR, ROBERT S 1 51.6% +50.4%

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17996489 TIME-RESOLVING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING SPECTROSCOPY SMITH, DAVID E 97d overdue
19248266 LEVELING INFANT BED ORTIZ, ADAM C —
18970680 FUSION PLATE TO ASSIST FUSION OF A FIRST AND SECOND BONE CHANG, OLIVIA C —
18951376 HUMAN-POWERED STIMULATING/SENSING IMPLANT SYSTEM MORALES, JON ERIC C —
18708467 PREDICTING COVID-19 ANTIBODIES AMONG SURVIVORS WITH DEEP RNA SEQUENCING CORNELIUS, CLAIRE ADRIENNE —
18528750 USING DEEP RNA SEQUENCING DATA TO IDENTIFY ANTIMICROBIAL-RESISTANT BACTERIA YU, TIAN NMN —
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS BOECKELMAN, JACOB A —
18286985 ANDROGEN RECEPTOR INHIBITION TO TREAT SEPSIS AND SHOCK PIHONAK, SARAH —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18638615 ACCESS PORT SYSTEM WITH SELF-ADJUSTING CATHETER LENGTH STIGELL, THEODORE J 84d overdue
19248266 LEVELING INFANT BED ORTIZ, ADAM C —
18970680 FUSION PLATE TO ASSIST FUSION OF A FIRST AND SECOND BONE CHANG, OLIVIA C —
18951376 HUMAN-POWERED STIMULATING/SENSING IMPLANT SYSTEM MORALES, JON ERIC C —
18528750 USING DEEP RNA SEQUENCING DATA TO IDENTIFY ANTIMICROBIAL-RESISTANT BACTERIA YU, TIAN NMN —
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS BOECKELMAN, JACOB A —
18286985 ANDROGEN RECEPTOR INHIBITION TO TREAT SEPSIS AND SHOCK PIHONAK, SARAH —
18552887 WEAR LAYER COMPOSITIONS LING, DORIS —

Client Portfolio (11 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36731
37751
37961
16721
37831
16811
16551
16271
17641
17171

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19248266 LEVELING INFANT BED Kids2, LLC ORTIZ, ADAM C 3673 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 24, 2025
18970680 FUSION PLATE TO ASSIST FUSION OF A FIRST AND SECOND BONE Arc Techtonics, Inc. CHANG, OLIVIA C 3775 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18951376 HUMAN-POWERED STIMULATING/SENSING IMPLANT SYSTEM Evoke Medical, LLC Dba Directsync Surgical MORALES, JON ERIC C 3796 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18708467 PREDICTING COVID-19 ANTIBODIES AMONG SURVIVORS WITH DEEP RNA SEQUENCING Rhode Island Hospital CORNELIUS, CLAIRE ADRIENNE 1672 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 08, 2024
18638615 ACCESS PORT SYSTEM WITH SELF-ADJUSTING CATHETER LENGTH Imotik Biosolutions LLC STIGELL, THEODORE J 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 84d overdue Pending Apr 17, 2024
18528750 USING DEEP RNA SEQUENCING DATA TO IDENTIFY ANTIMICROBIAL-RESISTANT BACTERIA Rhode Island Hospital YU, TIAN NMN 1681 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 04, 2023
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS The University of Nottingham BOECKELMAN, JACOB A 1655 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 26, 2023
18286985 ANDROGEN RECEPTOR INHIBITION TO TREAT SEPSIS AND SHOCK Applied Biology, Inc. PIHONAK, SARAH 1627 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 13, 2023
18552887 WEAR LAYER COMPOSITIONS Bixby International Corporataion LING, DORIS 1764 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 27, 2023
18341067 DENTAL ALIGNER BIXBY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION WALTERS JR, ROBERT S 1717 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 26, 2023
18314803 CARTILAGE-DERIVED PROGENITOR CELL LINES Rhode Island Hospital STAVROU, CONSTANTINA E 1632 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 09, 2023
17996489 TIME-RESOLVING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING SPECTROSCOPY Research Instruments Corporation SMITH, DAVID E 2881 §102§103 Final Rejection 97d overdue Pending Oct 18, 2022
17933986 APPARATUS, METHOD, SYSTEM FOR THE DETERMINATION OF BLOODBORNE FACTORS INDICATIVE OF INFLAMMATION Alcor Scientific LLC TURK, NEIL N 1798 §112Other Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Sep 21, 2022

Managing Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

87.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C. were allowed, across 1,387 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C. average before allowance?

2.92 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, P.C. have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 11 clients, before 13 examiners in 13 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month