Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Alg Intellectual Property | AB

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 7 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

ALG Intellectual Property | AB is a patent law firm that specializes in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, where it has managed 1970 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 91.92 percent, reflecting an ability to secure patent grants for mechanical and medical device inventions. This success rate is a performance metric for their work in these technical fields.

The firm currently has 6 pending office actions. Their prosecution history shows an average of 3.43 office actions per allowance. This metric indicates a persistent approach to examiner interaction, ensuring that the 91.92 percent allowance rate is maintained through the efforts recorded in the data. For practitioners, the 3.43 average provides an expectation for the intensity of the prosecution cycle in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering.

The 1970 career applications provide a data set for evaluating the firm's long-term performance. The 91.92 percent allowance rate and 3.43 office actions per allowance together characterize a firm that is both successful and dedicated. The 6 pending office actions represent a focused portion of their current active workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1970 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.9%
Allowance Rate
n=1970
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1970
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=1387
+0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1387
1006 days
Time to Allowance
n=1387
-6.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1970
31.2%
RCE Rate
n=1970
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1970

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.9%
§101 Overcome
n=196
86.0%
§102 Overcome
n=659
84.5%
§103 Overcome
n=1021
82.3%
§112 Overcome
n=430

Specialization & Scale

H04N, G03B, G02F
Top CPC Subclasses
29%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1970
6
Practitioners
n=1970
328.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=1970

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN 1 70.4% +18.8%
HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 1 27.3% +33.9%
SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 1 83.8% +8.1%
EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 1 70.4% +34.9%
WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 1 55.6% +46.6%
BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 1 34.0% +33.2%
FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 1 27.8% +40.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18718210 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COCHLEAR TRAUMA MANAGEMENT DURING AN ELECTRODE LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17853281 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 12d
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 21d
18876436 System and Method for Inserting an Electrode Lead into a Cochlea HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN —
18787093 A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A SKIN FLAP OF A RECIPIENT HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER —
18622075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING STIMULUS FREQUENCIES TO USE DURING A LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE WELCH, WILLOW GRACE —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17853281 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 12d
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 21d
18876436 System and Method for Inserting an Electrode Lead into a Cochlea HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN —
18787093 A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A SKIN FLAP OF A RECIPIENT HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER —
18678686 DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A PROCEDURE ASSOCIATED WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT —
18622075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING STIMULUS FREQUENCIES TO USE DURING A LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE WELCH, WILLOW GRACE —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
ADVANCED BIONICS AG 3
Advanced Bionics 3
Tim Nauwelaers 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37964
37922
37711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18876436 System and Method for Inserting an Electrode Lead into a Cochlea Tim Nauwelaers HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN 3771 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2024
18787093 A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A SKIN FLAP OF A RECIPIENT Advanced Bionics LLC HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 3796 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024
18718210 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COCHLEAR TRAUMA MANAGEMENT DURING AN ELECTRODE LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE Advanced Bionics LLC SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 3796 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18678686 DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A PROCEDURE ASSOCIATED WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT Advanced Bionics AG EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 3792 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 30, 2024
18622075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING STIMULUS FREQUENCIES TO USE DURING A LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE Advanced Bionics LLC WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 3792 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 29, 2024
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE Advanced Bionics AG BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 3796 §101§103 Final Rejection 21d Pending Jul 21, 2022
17853281 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM Advanced Bionics AG FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 3796 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Jun 29, 2022

Managing Alg Intellectual Property | AB's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month