Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 14, 2026

Alg Intellectual Property | AB

5 pending office actions • 1 client • 5 examiners • 2 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=4966 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.6%
Allowance Rate
n=4966
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=4966
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=2757
-0.19σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=2757
937 days
Time to Allowance
n=2757
-1.9pp
Interview Lift
n=4966
28.3%
RCE Rate
n=4966
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=4966

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

69.5%
§101 Overcome
n=95
89.8%
§102 Overcome
n=462
84.3%
§103 Overcome
n=1888
91.8%
§112 Overcome
n=171

Specialization & Scale

G06F, A61N, H04R
Top CPC Subclasses
27%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=4966
6
Practitioners
n=4966
827.7
Apps / Practitioner
n=4966

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (80%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Double-patenting only1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 1 81.0% +8.3%
VOORHEES, CATHERINE M 1 83.3% +14.1%
WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 1 48.3% +51.9%
HOUGH, JESSANDRA F 1 45.0% +36.3%
BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 1 21.1% +28.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18986129 SCALAR TRANSLOCATION DETECTION FOR AN ELECTRODE LEAD OF A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM DIETRICH, JOSEPH M
18286696 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME VOORHEES, CATHERINE M

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 21d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 21d
18286696 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME VOORHEES, CATHERINE M
17923833 SENSOR-BASED TINNITUS TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS WELCH, WILLOW GRACE
17914632 TINNITUS TREATMENT WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM HOUGH, JESSANDRA F

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Advanced Bionics 5

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37922
37962

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18986129 SCALAR TRANSLOCATION DETECTION FOR AN ELECTRODE LEAD OF A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Advanced Bionics AG DIETRICH, JOSEPH M DP Non-Final OA Pending Dec 18, 2024
18286696 HEARING PROSTHESIS SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME Advanced Bionics AG VOORHEES, CATHERINE M 3792 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 12, 2023
17923833 SENSOR-BASED TINNITUS TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS Advanced Bionics AG WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 3792 §103 Final Rejection Pending Nov 07, 2022
17914632 TINNITUS TREATMENT WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Advanced Bionics AG HOUGH, JESSANDRA F 3796 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 26, 2022
17870353 ELECTRODE LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE DURING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT LEAD INSERTION PROCEDURE Advanced Bionics AG BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 3796 §103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Jul 21, 2022

Managing Alg Intellectual Property | AB's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month