Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Alg Intellectual Property | Iqvia

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 2 clients • 9 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

ALG Intellectual Property | IQVIA is a patent law firm that focuses on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems, having handled 1970 career applications. The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate of 91.92 percent, demonstrating a capability in securing patent protection for mechanical and e-commerce innovations. This success rate is an indicator of their proficiency in these sectors.

The firm currently manages 7 pending office actions. Their prosecution history includes an average of 3.43 office actions per allowance. This figure suggests a persistent approach to examiner interaction, requiring the rounds of communication recorded in the data to reach the 91.92 percent allowance rate. For practitioners, the 3.43 average provides an expectation for the intensity of the prosecution cycle in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems.

With 1970 career applications, the firm has a foundation of experience in the industry. The 91.92 percent allowance rate and 3.43 office actions per allowance together paint a picture of a firm with a track record of success. These metrics, along with the 7 pending office actions, offer a view of the firm's performance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1970 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.9%
Allowance Rate
n=1970
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1970
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=1387
+0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1387
1006 days
Time to Allowance
n=1387
-6.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1970
31.2%
RCE Rate
n=1970
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1970

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.9%
§101 Overcome
n=196
86.0%
§102 Overcome
n=659
84.5%
§103 Overcome
n=1021
82.3%
§112 Overcome
n=430

Specialization & Scale

H04N, G03B, G02F
Top CPC Subclasses
29%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1970
6
Practitioners
n=1970
328.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=1970

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (80%)
2
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (30%)
§101 + other5 (50%)
§103 only2 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
30% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 2 65.7% +19.3%
LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI 1 83.9% +50.9%
MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 1 49.0% +49.0%
KANAAN, LIZA TONY 1 23.4% +31.5%
REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH 1 30.2% +33.2%
COBANOGLU, DILEK B 1 33.3% +27.0%
CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 1 59.6% +27.7%
BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N 1 55.9% +36.4%
ORR, HENRY W 1 50.5% +37.3%

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18235510 METHOD FOR PREDICTING RISK OF DEPRESSION RELAPSE OR ONSET COBANOGLU, DILEK B 32d overdue
18126100 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING, DETECTING AND MONITORING SLEEP DISTURBANCES AND INSOMNIA SYMPTOMS CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 15d overdue
17461494 METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING, DETECTING, AND MONITORING ADHD BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N 16d
19067188 UNBIASED ETL SYSTEM FOR TIMED MEDICAL EVENT PREDICTION MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 41d
18883806 SOURCE DATA REVIEW SYSTEM REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH 76d
19095170 PROVIDING ACCESS TO CLINICAL TRIAL DATA CONYERS, DAWAUNE A —
19091648 MATCHING SERVICE REQUESTER WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI —
18885234 CLINICAL TRIAL OPERATIONAL PLAN GENERATION KANAAN, LIZA TONY —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18235510 METHOD FOR PREDICTING RISK OF DEPRESSION RELAPSE OR ONSET COBANOGLU, DILEK B 32d overdue
18126100 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING, DETECTING AND MONITORING SLEEP DISTURBANCES AND INSOMNIA SYMPTOMS CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 15d overdue
17461494 METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING, DETECTING, AND MONITORING ADHD BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N 16d
19067188 UNBIASED ETL SYSTEM FOR TIMED MEDICAL EVENT PREDICTION MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 41d
17308415 AI AND ML ASSISTED SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING SITE COMPLIANCE USING SITE VISIT REPORT ORR, HENRY W 42d
18883806 SOURCE DATA REVIEW SYSTEM REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH 76d
19095170 PROVIDING ACCESS TO CLINICAL TRIAL DATA CONYERS, DAWAUNE A —
19091648 MATCHING SERVICE REQUESTER WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Iqvia 9
Iqvia, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21592
36821
36831
36861
36871
37921
37151
21721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19095170 PROVIDING ACCESS TO CLINICAL TRIAL DATA Iqvia Inc. CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 2159 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2025
19091648 MATCHING SERVICE REQUESTER WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS Iqvia Inc. LAM, PHILIP HUNG FAI §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 26, 2025
19067188 UNBIASED ETL SYSTEM FOR TIMED MEDICAL EVENT PREDICTION Iqvia, Inc. MONTICELLO, WILLIAM THOMAS 3682 §101§103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Feb 28, 2025
18956681 PROVIDING ACCESS TO CLINICAL TRIAL DATA Iqvia Inc. CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 2159 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 22, 2024
18885234 CLINICAL TRIAL OPERATIONAL PLAN GENERATION Iqvia Inc. KANAAN, LIZA TONY 3683 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18883806 SOURCE DATA REVIEW SYSTEM Iqvia Inc. REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH 3686 §101 Non-Final OA 76d Pending Sep 12, 2024
18235510 METHOD FOR PREDICTING RISK OF DEPRESSION RELAPSE OR ONSET Iqvia Inc. COBANOGLU, DILEK B 3687 §101§112 Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending Aug 18, 2023
18126100 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING, DETECTING AND MONITORING SLEEP DISTURBANCES AND INSOMNIA SYMPTOMS Iqvia Inc. CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY 3792 §101 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Mar 24, 2023
17461494 METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING, DETECTING, AND MONITORING ADHD Iqvia Inc. BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N 3715 §101§112 Final Rejection 16d Pending Aug 30, 2021
17308415 AI AND ML ASSISTED SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING SITE COMPLIANCE USING SITE VISIT REPORT Iqvia Inc. ORR, HENRY W 2172 §103 Non-Final OA 42d Pending May 05, 2021

Managing Alg Intellectual Property | Iqvia's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month