Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Anderson Patent Law Firm LLC

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

9 pending office actions • 8 clients • 9 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Anderson Patent Law Firm LLC specializes in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals, with a history of 659 career applications. The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate of 83.17 percent. Prosecution typically involves 4.14 office actions per allowance, a figure that highlights the iterative nature of securing patents in the life sciences sector. These metrics offer a view of the firm's historical performance and its experience with biotechnological filings.

The firm is currently managing 5 pending office actions. Given the 659 career applications, these 5 pending matters represent the firm's current active engagement with the USPTO. The 83.17 percent allowance rate and the 4.14 office actions per allowance provide a statistical profile of the firm's historical effectiveness. Practitioners can use these data points to estimate the likely effort and success rate for applications handled by the firm within these technical fields.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=659 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.2%
Allowance Rate
n=659
+0.71σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=659
4.1
OAs to Allowance
n=430
+0.30σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=430
1249 days
Time to Allowance
n=430
+12.0pp
Interview Lift
n=659
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=659
6.8%
Appeal Rate
n=659

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.6%
§101 Overcome
n=67
80.3%
§102 Overcome
n=178
83.0%
§103 Overcome
n=283
85.5%
§112 Overcome
n=255

Specialization & Scale

C12N, G01N, A61K
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=659
0
Practitioners
n=659
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=659 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (56%)
3
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (11%)
§101 + other1 (11%)
§103 only3 (33%)
§112 only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
56% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
11% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAWKINS, DOMINIC E 1 86.9% +12.1%
WESTERBERG, NISSA M 1 23.4% +37.1%
KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 1 20.8% +95.0%
STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS 1 — —
PENDLETON, DIONNE 1 69.8% +15.7%
FAY, ZOHREH ALEMZADEH 1 52.2% -6.2%
PRAGANI, RAJAN 1 53.3% +70.0%
HAQ, SHAFIQUL 1 64.8% +55.2%
CONNORS, ALEXANDRA F 1 23.9% +45.4%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17627785 Novel Erwinia Strains and Related Methods FAY, ZOHREH ALEMZADEH 126d overdue
16328853 Provision of a Therapeutically Active Cell Product CONNORS, ALEXANDRA F 10d overdue
18938433 Method and Apparatus for Noninvasive Determination of Utilization HAWKINS, DOMINIC E —
18570180 Contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging WESTERBERG, NISSA M —
18555300 System and process for producing synthetic fuels without emitting carbon dioxide KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE —
18039356 Selection Methods STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18026990 Method and system for contextual notification PENDLETON, DIONNE 120d overdue
17627751 Cosmetic Preparations Comprising Natural Activators PRAGANI, RAJAN 104d overdue
16328853 Provision of a Therapeutically Active Cell Product CONNORS, ALEXANDRA F 10d overdue
17409066 Predictive Markers Useful in the Treatment of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration HAQ, SHAFIQUL 79d
18938433 Method and Apparatus for Noninvasive Determination of Utilization HAWKINS, DOMINIC E —
18570180 Contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging WESTERBERG, NISSA M —
18555300 System and process for producing synthetic fuels without emitting carbon dioxide KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16921
26891
16171
16141
16781
16341

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18938433 Method and Apparatus for Noninvasive Determination of Utilization Elemental Machines, Inc. HAWKINS, DOMINIC E §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2024
18570180 Contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging Betavist GmbH WESTERBERG, NISSA M §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 14, 2023
18555300 System and process for producing synthetic fuels without emitting carbon dioxide Edl Anlagenbau Gesellschaft Mbh KUYKENDALL, ALYSSA LEE 1692 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 13, 2023
18039356 Selection Methods Agriculture Victoria Services Pty Ltd STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2023
18026990 Method and system for contextual notification Elemental Machines, Inc. PENDLETON, DIONNE 2689 §103 Non-Final OA 120d overdue Pending Mar 17, 2023
17627785 Novel Erwinia Strains and Related Methods Geoffrey Gardiner Dairy Foundation Limited FAY, ZOHREH ALEMZADEH 1617 §101 Non-Final OA 126d overdue Pending Jan 17, 2022
17627751 Cosmetic Preparations Comprising Natural Activators UNIVERSITÄT BASEL PRAGANI, RAJAN 1614 §103 Final Rejection 104d overdue Pending Jan 17, 2022
17409066 Predictive Markers Useful in the Treatment of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Maintect GmbH HAQ, SHAFIQUL 1678 §112 Final Rejection 79d Pending Aug 23, 2021
16328853 Provision of a Therapeutically Active Cell Product Pdi Pharm Development International AG CONNORS, ALEXANDRA F 1634 §103 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Feb 27, 2019

Managing Anderson Patent Law Firm LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month