Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Asgaard Patent Services, LLC

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 2 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Asgaard Patent Services, LLC operates in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm has handled 401 career applications and maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 93.15. This rate reflects the firm's history of securing patent rights in these technical fields. The 93.15 percent allowance rate is a key indicator of the firm's results. Practitioners can look to this historical success rate when assessing the firm's prosecution capabilities.

With 3 pending office actions, the firm's current workload is focused on a small number of active matters. The average of 1.43 office actions per allowance indicates the typical level of engagement required with the USPTO. This 1.43 average helps in setting expectations for the number of interactions required to reach a final decision. With 401 applications in its history, the firm has established a clear performance record. The 3 pending actions represent the current active workload for the firm.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=401 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.2%
Allowance Rate
n=401
+0.38σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=401
1.4
OAs to Allowance
n=231
-1.35σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=231
688 days
Time to Allowance
n=231
-0.0pp
Interview Lift
n=401
12.1%
RCE Rate
n=401
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=401

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
72.5%
§102 Overcome
n=80
64.5%
§103 Overcome
n=76
73.2%
§112 Overcome
n=56

Specialization & Scale

F41G, F41A, F41C
Top CPC Subclasses
29%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=401
1
Practitioners
n=401
401.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=401

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
1
Medium (20%)
2
Easy (40%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (20%)
§112 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FREEMAN, JOSHUA E 1 82.0% +12.1%
LEE, BENJAMIN P 1 80.0% +17.0%
ALEKSIC, NEVENA 1 75.0% +9.4%
HYEON, HAE M 1 85.7% +10.2%
HENZE, DAVID V 1 69.7% +23.3%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19419845 SLING MOUNT FREEMAN, JOSHUA E —
18743738 TAILCAP ASSEMBLY WITH A USB TYPE-C RECEPTACLE HYEON, HAE M —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18132944 HELMET WITH AN INTEGRATED POWER SOURCE FOR CONNECTED ELECTRONIC DEVICES HENZE, DAVID V 8d
19095175 MOUNTS FOR OPTICAL SIGHTING DEVICES LEE, BENJAMIN P —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18132944 HELMET WITH AN INTEGRATED POWER SOURCE FOR CONNECTED ELECTRONIC DEVICES HENZE, DAVID V 8d
19419845 SLING MOUNT FREEMAN, JOSHUA E —
19095175 MOUNTS FOR OPTICAL SIGHTING DEVICES LEE, BENJAMIN P —
18743738 TAILCAP ASSEMBLY WITH A USB TYPE-C RECEPTACLE HYEON, HAE M —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36412
28591

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19419845 SLING MOUNT One Hundred Concepts, LLC FREEMAN, JOSHUA E 3641 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 15, 2025
19095175 MOUNTS FOR OPTICAL SIGHTING DEVICES Division Group, LLC LEE, BENJAMIN P 3641 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2025
19078702 ADJUSTABLE CHAIR FOR POST-SURGICAL RECOVERY Contour De Lux, LLC ALEKSIC, NEVENA §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 13, 2025
18743738 TAILCAP ASSEMBLY WITH A USB TYPE-C RECEPTACLE Division Group, LLC HYEON, HAE M §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 14, 2024
18132944 HELMET WITH AN INTEGRATED POWER SOURCE FOR CONNECTED ELECTRONIC DEVICES Division Group, LLC HENZE, DAVID V 2859 §102§103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Apr 10, 2023

Managing Asgaard Patent Services, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month