Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Bachmann Law Group Pc

7 pending office actions • 4 clients • 7 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=107 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

52.7%
Allowance Rate
n=107
-0.30σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=107
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=29
-0.06σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=29
1338 days
Time to Allowance
n=29
+16.7pp
Interview Lift
n=107
29.1%
RCE Rate
n=107
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=107

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

33.3%
§101 Overcome
n=21
45.2%
§102 Overcome
n=31
39.1%
§103 Overcome
n=46
50.0%
§112 Overcome
n=26

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, G06N
Top CPC Subclasses
34%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=107
0
Practitioners
n=107
Apps / Practitioner
n=107 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (57%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRACY JR., EDWARD 1 78.4% +33.9%
ROBERTS, SHAUN A 1 76.0% +10.8%
MOBIN, HASANUL 1 75.3% +38.9%
ERB, NATHAN 1 51.8% +0.2%
BOSWELL, BETH V 1 9.4% -2.9%
NILSSON, ERIC 1 82.8% +17.2%
DUMBRIS, SETH M 1 76.3% +16.6%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18088406 OPTIMIZING PRICE BASED ON HISTOGRAM RIGHT HAND SIDE DISTRIBUTION ELASTICITY BOSWELL, BETH V 44d overdue
17147462 COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS DUMBRIS, SETH M 11d overdue
18751047 INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING ROBERTS, SHAUN A 6d
18545712 AUTOMATED AGENT CONTROLS ERB, NATHAN 22d
18986160 INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION TRACY JR., EDWARD
18606237 AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS MOBIN, HASANUL
17339988 AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS NILSSON, ERIC

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17147462 COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS DUMBRIS, SETH M 11d overdue
18751047 INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING ROBERTS, SHAUN A 6d
18986160 INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION TRACY JR., EDWARD
18606237 AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS MOBIN, HASANUL
17339988 AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS NILSSON, ERIC

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26551
36281
36251
21981
17841

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18986160 INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION Scaled Cognition, Inc. TRACY JR., EDWARD §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 18, 2024
18751047 INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING Scaled Cognition, Inc. ROBERTS, SHAUN A 2655 §102§103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Jun 21, 2024
18606237 AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS Scaled Cognition, Inc. MOBIN, HASANUL §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 15, 2024
18545712 AUTOMATED AGENT CONTROLS Scaled Cognition, Inc. ERB, NATHAN 3628 §101§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Dec 19, 2023
18088406 OPTIMIZING PRICE BASED ON HISTOGRAM RIGHT HAND SIDE DISTRIBUTION ELASTICITY Price Fx Inc. BOSWELL, BETH V 3625 §101§103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Dec 23, 2022
17339988 AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS Asserts Inc. NILSSON, ERIC 2198 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 05, 2021
17147462 COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS Hemlock Semiconductor Operations LLC DUMBRIS, SETH M 1784 §103§112 Final Rejection 11d overdue Pending Jan 13, 2021

Managing Bachmann Law Group Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month