Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
6 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bachmann Law Group PC focuses on the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has managed 106 career applications, with a resolved allowance rate of 49.09 percent. This rate is achieved with an average of 3.63 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm has 3 pending office actions.
The data shows the prosecution environment for the firm, as evidenced by the 49.09 percent allowance rate and the 3.63 office actions required per allowance. For a practitioner, this suggests that securing patents in Chemistry & Materials involves multiple rounds of communication. The firm's experience with 106 career applications provides a basis for navigating these complexities. The current 3 pending office actions indicate ongoing efforts within the chemical and materials sectors. This profile provides a specific look at the firm's performance metrics and current workload.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRACY JR., EDWARD | 1 | 76.7% | +38.2% |
| ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 1 | 76.0% | +10.6% |
| MOBIN, HASANUL | 1 | 75.3% | +38.8% |
| ERB, NATHAN | 1 | 51.4% | +0.1% |
| NILSSON, ERIC | 1 | 82.7% | +17.6% |
| DUMBRIS, SETH M | 1 | 76.4% | +16.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17147462 | COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS | DUMBRIS, SETH M | 11d overdue |
| 18751047 | INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING | ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 6d |
| 18545712 | AUTOMATED AGENT CONTROLS | ERB, NATHAN | 22d |
| 18986160 | INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION | TRACY JR., EDWARD | — |
| 18606237 | AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS | MOBIN, HASANUL | — |
| 17339988 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS | NILSSON, ERIC | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17147462 | COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS | DUMBRIS, SETH M | 11d overdue |
| 18751047 | INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING | ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 6d |
| 18986160 | INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION | TRACY JR., EDWARD | — |
| 18606237 | AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS | MOBIN, HASANUL | — |
| 17339988 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS | NILSSON, ERIC | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Scaled Cognition, Inc. | 4 |
| Asserts Inc. | 1 |
| Hemlock Semiconductor | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2655 | 1 |
| 3628 | 1 |
| 2198 | 1 |
| 1784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18986160 | INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | TRACY JR., EDWARD | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 18, 2024 | |
| 18751047 | INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 2655 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
| 18606237 | AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | MOBIN, HASANUL | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 | |
| 18545712 | AUTOMATED AGENT CONTROLS | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | ERB, NATHAN | 3628 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Dec 19, 2023 |
| 17339988 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS | Asserts Inc. | NILSSON, ERIC | 2198 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 05, 2021 |
| 17147462 | COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS | Hemlock Semiconductor Operations LLC | DUMBRIS, SETH M | 1784 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Jan 13, 2021 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial