Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Belvis Law

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

14 pending office actions • 8 clients • 13 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Belvis Law has 321 career applications and 14 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. Its application history supplies context for the current docket, which includes matters that remain subject to examination or other office-action response requirements.

The firm reports a resolved allowance rate of 90.81% and an average of 4.46 office actions per allowance. This combination presents a favorable resolved allowance result alongside a comparatively extended office-action path within the reported data. Clients should therefore evaluate not only the likelihood of reaching allowance, but also the response effort and prosecution duration associated with the relevant type of matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=321 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.8%
Allowance Rate
n=321
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=321
4.5
OAs to Allowance
n=168
+0.34σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=168
1493 days
Time to Allowance
n=168
+9.8pp
Interview Lift
n=321
63.2%
RCE Rate
n=321
4.3%
Appeal Rate
n=321

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

85.0%
§101 Overcome
n=20
77.9%
§102 Overcome
n=68
74.6%
§103 Overcome
n=130
75.8%
§112 Overcome
n=128

Specialization & Scale

A61F, A61B, E21B
Top CPC Subclasses
36%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=321
0
Practitioners
n=321
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=321 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (21%)
3
Easy (21%)
1
Unknown (7%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (7%)
§102 only1 (7%)
§112 only3 (21%)
Double-patenting + other1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (50%)
No statute on record1 (7%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
36% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
64% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC 2 45.8% +43.2%
HARCOURT, BRAD 1 84.3% +5.6%
GEISBERT, WILLIAM ADDISON 1 38.5% +51.4%
LOEWE, ROBERT S 1 83.8% +3.8%
N'DURE, AMIE MERCEDES 1 78.3% +14.9%
FARAH, AHMED M 1 78.9% +18.9%
ISKRA, JOSEPH W 1 71.3% +27.1%
PEREZ, JELITZA M 1 75.1% +28.9%
KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 1 78.0% +23.6%
NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1 66.0% +27.9%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19088913 Non-fracturing Restimulation of Unconventional Hydrocarbon Containing Formations to Enhance Production HARCOURT, BRAD 32d overdue
18762197 Methods of Making SiC Boules and Wafers LOEWE, ROBERT S —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17877941 Systems and Methods for Reducing Pollutants, Including Carbon in Public Utilities, Agriculture and Manufacturing NORRIS, CLAIRE A 89d overdue
18123245 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURES OF THE EYE INCLUDING SHAPE AND POSITIONS KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 84d overdue
19198036 COMMUNITY FIRE MANAGEMENT METHODS AND SYSTEMS ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC 71d overdue
17979716 NETWORKS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS HAVING A HYDRATION PLAN CONTROL SYSTEM FOR WILDFIRE MITIGATION ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC 55d
18318639 Blue Laser Metal Additive Manufacturing System ISKRA, JOSEPH W —
18198279 Systems, Devices and Methods for Intensification of Reformers and Downstream Chemical Synthesis PEREZ, JELITZA M —
17140034 COMPACT RECONFIGURABLE INTEGRATED LASER-PHACO SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE KISH, JAMES M —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17877941 Systems and Methods for Reducing Pollutants, Including Carbon in Public Utilities, Agriculture and Manufacturing NORRIS, CLAIRE A 89d overdue
18123245 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURES OF THE EYE INCLUDING SHAPE AND POSITIONS KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 84d overdue
19198036 COMMUNITY FIRE MANAGEMENT METHODS AND SYSTEMS ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC 71d overdue
17979716 NETWORKS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS HAVING A HYDRATION PLAN CONTROL SYSTEM FOR WILDFIRE MITIGATION ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC 55d
18773500 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING WASTEWATER AND PROVIDING CLASS A SLUDGE GEISBERT, WILLIAM ADDISON —
18413968 High Resolution Composite Seismic Imaging, Systems and Methods N'DURE, AMIE MERCEDES —
18387422 METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO PROVIDE EXCLUDED DEFINED ZONES FOR INCREASING ACCOMMODATIVE AMPLITUDE FARAH, AHMED M —
18318639 Blue Laser Metal Additive Manufacturing System ISKRA, JOSEPH W —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37523
37923
17792
36741
17661
36451
37611
17741
17711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19198036 COMMUNITY FIRE MANAGEMENT METHODS AND SYSTEMS Has LLC ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC 3752 §103§112 Non-Final OA 71d overdue Pending May 03, 2025
19088913 Non-fracturing Restimulation of Unconventional Hydrocarbon Containing Formations to Enhance Production Borehole Seismic, Llc. HARCOURT, BRAD 3674 §103DP Final Rejection 32d overdue Pending Mar 24, 2025
18773500 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING WASTEWATER AND PROVIDING CLASS A SLUDGE Advanced Innovators, Inc. GEISBERT, WILLIAM ADDISON 1779 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18762197 Methods of Making SiC Boules and Wafers Pallldus, Inc. LOEWE, ROBERT S 1766 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 02, 2024
18413968 High Resolution Composite Seismic Imaging, Systems and Methods Borehole Seismic, Llc. N'DURE, AMIE MERCEDES 3645 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 16, 2024
18387422 METHODS AND SYSTEMS TO PROVIDE EXCLUDED DEFINED ZONES FOR INCREASING ACCOMMODATIVE AMPLITUDE Lensar, Inc. FARAH, AHMED M 3792 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2023
18318639 Blue Laser Metal Additive Manufacturing System Nuburu, Inc. ISKRA, JOSEPH W 3761 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2023
18198279 Systems, Devices and Methods for Intensification of Reformers and Downstream Chemical Synthesis M2X Energy Inc. PEREZ, JELITZA M 1774 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2023
18123245 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURES OF THE EYE INCLUDING SHAPE AND POSITIONS Lensar, Inc. KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 3792 §102§103 Non-Final OA 84d overdue Pending Mar 17, 2023
17979716 NETWORKS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS HAVING A HYDRATION PLAN CONTROL SYSTEM FOR WILDFIRE MITIGATION Has LLC ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC 3752 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 55d Pending Nov 02, 2022
17877941 Systems and Methods for Reducing Pollutants, Including Carbon in Public Utilities, Agriculture and Manufacturing Advanced Innovators Inc. NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1779 §102§112 Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending Jul 30, 2022
17668335 AUTOMATED WILDFIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES AND PROPERTY Has LLC LIEUWEN, CODY J 3752 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2022
17140034 COMPACT RECONFIGURABLE INTEGRATED LASER-PHACO SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE Lensar, Inc. KISH, JAMES M 3792 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 01, 2021
16081947 METHOD AND CATALYST FOR PRODUCING HIGH OCTANE COMPONENTS LLC "Ngt-Synthesis" STEIN, MICHELLE 1771 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 03, 2018

Managing Belvis Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Belvis Law's patent allowance rate?

90.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Belvis Law were allowed, across 321 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Belvis Law average before allowance?

4.46 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Belvis Law have?

14 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 13 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month