Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

James M Kish, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as KISH, JAMES M

Tech Center 3700 • Art Units: 3737 3771 3791 3792 3793 3795 3796 3799

This examiner grants 62% of resolved cases

Analysis

James M. Kish is assigned to Tech Center 3700 and Art Unit 3737. His record includes 660 resolved cases, a 62.4% allowance rate, and a median of 1,582 days to allowance. The interview lift is 11.8%, indicating a positive association between interviews and allowance in the supplied data.

The listed companies are Novocure GmbH, Alcon Inc., and Pacesetter Inc. The listed firms are Potomac Law Group PLLC, AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP, and AMPACC Law Group, PLLC. The 1,582-day median is the central timing consideration for practitioners handling this docket. Interviews may provide some benefit, as reflected by the 11.8% lift, but the 62.4% allowance rate remains the more comprehensive indicator of resolved-case outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

62.4%
Allow Rate
-7.6% vs TC avg
715
Total Applications
+11.8%
Interview Lift
1582
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 660 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

5.2%
§101 Eligibility
12.6%
§102 Novelty
52.1%
§103 Obviousness
22.4%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18810080 CONTINUUM ROBOT Non-Final OA CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18660944 ENDOLUMINAL ROBOTIC CATHETER CONTROLLER Non-Final OA Covidien LP
18796670 SMART CONNECTORS FOR ROBOTIC TOOLS Final Rejection Alcon Inc.
18677596 ROBOTIC THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISPLAY MOUNT FOR DIGITAL VISUALIZATION OF OPHTHALMIC SURGERY Non-Final OA Alcon Inc.
18651905 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING KIDNEY FUNCTION Final Rejection ABIOMED, Inc.
18413819 ELECTRODE ATTACHMENT IN WEARABLE CARDIAC DEVICES Final Rejection ZOLL Medical Corporation
18625900 ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS Final Rejection NuVasive, Inc.
18898788 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING LASING INSIDE AN ENDOSCOPE Non-Final OA LUMENIS LTD.
18608505 Surgical Cart With Robotic Arm Final Rejection Medtronic Navigation, Inc.
18615149 SHOCKING ELECTRODES FOR IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICES AND METHODS OF PRODUCING THE SHOCKING ELECTRODES Final Rejection Pacesetter, Inc.
18610143 BIOSTIMULATOR HAVING MOVABLE PACING ELEMENT Final Rejection Pacesetter, Inc.
18611384 Sensing of Tissue Signals in a Deep Brain Stimulation System Using a Head-Positioned Sensing Reference Electrode Non-Final OA Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
18581910 DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS) METHOD AND DEVICE Final Rejection Worcester Polytechnic Institute
17952177 GROUPING SIMILAR EPISODES DETECTED BY A WEARABLE MEDICAL DEVICE (WMD) Final Rejection WEST AFFUM HOLDINGS DAC
18897192 Delivering Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to a Subject's Brain Using Electrodes Installed in Through-Holes in the Subject's Skull Non-Final OA Novocure GmbH
18621809 METHODS OF TREATING SPINAL CORD INJURIES WITH ALTERNATING ELECTRIC FIELDS Final Rejection NOVOCURE GMBH
18617886 Reducing Electrosensation When Treating a Subject Using a Rotating Alternating Electric Field by Gradually Increasing the Amplitude of the Field Final Rejection Novocure GmbH
18278852 ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR THE OPERATION OF AN ENDOUROLOGICAL LASER SURGERY SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD Non-Final OA Coloplast A/S
18443227 LIGHT TREATMENT APPARATUS FOR TREATING VASCULAR LESIONS Non-Final OA LUTRONIC CORPORATION
18579907 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR ENABLING PATIENT-SPECIFIC ELECTROSTIMULATION OF NEURONAL TISSUE AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES AND SOFTWARE Final Rejection Bottneuro AG

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner James M Kish's allowance rate?

62.4% of resolved applications examined by James M Kish were allowed (660 resolved cases), compared with 0.0% across Art Unit 3737 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner James M Kish?

This examiner's interview lift is +11.8 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner James M Kish take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by James M Kish took 1,582 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner James M Kish work in?

James M Kish examines applications in Art Unit 3737 in Tech Center 3700 (Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month