Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Best Mode Ip Law Pllc

8 pending office actions • 3 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=64 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.4%
Allowance Rate
n=64
+0.47σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=64
OAs to Allowance
n=19 (min 20)
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=19 (min 20)
Time to Allowance
n=19 (min 20)
-9.1pp
Interview Lift
n=64
31.8%
RCE Rate
n=64
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=64

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
§102 Overcome
n=14 (min 20)
34.8%
§103 Overcome
n=23
§112 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

A61B, G06Q, G06T
Top CPC Subclasses
29%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=64
0
Practitioners
n=64
Apps / Practitioner
n=64 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
2
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (25%)
§103 only2 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
3
Communications
38% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRADEN, SHAWN M 1 66.8% +32.3%
AFRIFA-KYEI, ANTHONY D 1 65.0% +13.1%
SINGH, KAVEL 1 83.6% +13.9%
HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN 1 69.6% +42.9%
CAI, PHUONG HAU 1 78.9% +22.9%
SALEH, ZAID MUHAMMAD 1 67.3% +45.0%
WALKER, OLIVIA 1 36.4% +77.8%
DANG, CHRISTINE 1 49.1% +50.3%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18271740 VOTING SYSTEM AND VOTING PROGRAM DANG, CHRISTINE 4d overdue
18923690 CAUTIONING METHOD, RESTAURANT SYSTEM, RESTAURANT PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM SINGH, KAVEL 29d
18474620 OPHTHALMIC LASER TREATMENT DEVICE WALKER, OLIVIA 77d
18896688 OCT IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING OCT IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM AND OCT IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN
18403357 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CAI, PHUONG HAU

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18271740 VOTING SYSTEM AND VOTING PROGRAM DANG, CHRISTINE 4d overdue
18928187 RESTAURANT SYSTEM, ALERTING METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING ALERTING PROGRAM AFRIFA-KYEI, ANTHONY D 22d
18923690 CAUTIONING METHOD, RESTAURANT SYSTEM, RESTAURANT PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM SINGH, KAVEL 29d
18477067 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD SALEH, ZAID MUHAMMAD 69d
18474620 OPHTHALMIC LASER TREATMENT DEVICE WALKER, OLIVIA 77d
19097889 CONNECTOR BRADEN, SHAWN M
18896688 OCT IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING OCT IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM AND OCT IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN
18403357 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CAI, PHUONG HAU

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
NIDEK CO., LTD. 4
Kura Sushi 3
Asteria 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37361
26861
36511
26731
26681
37961
36981

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19097889 CONNECTOR Kura Sushi, Inc. BRADEN, SHAWN M 3736 DP Non-Final OA Pending Apr 02, 2025
18928187 RESTAURANT SYSTEM, ALERTING METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING ALERTING PROGRAM Kura Sushi, Inc. AFRIFA-KYEI, ANTHONY D 2686 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Oct 28, 2024
18923690 CAUTIONING METHOD, RESTAURANT SYSTEM, RESTAURANT PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM Kura Sushi, Inc. SINGH, KAVEL 3651 §102§103 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Oct 23, 2024
18896688 OCT IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING OCT IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM AND OCT IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD Nidek Co., Ltd. HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN §101§102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 25, 2024
18403357 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM Nidek Co., Ltd. CAI, PHUONG HAU 2673 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Jan 03, 2024
18477067 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD Nidek Co., Ltd. SALEH, ZAID MUHAMMAD 2668 §103 Final Rejection 69d Pending Sep 28, 2023
18474620 OPHTHALMIC LASER TREATMENT DEVICE Nidek Co., Ltd. WALKER, OLIVIA 3796 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 77d Pending Sep 26, 2023
18271740 VOTING SYSTEM AND VOTING PROGRAM Asteria Corporation DANG, CHRISTINE 3698 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Jul 11, 2023

Managing Best Mode Ip Law Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month