Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nidek Co., Ltd.

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

10 pending office actions • 3 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nidek Co., Ltd. is currently overseeing 8 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These filings are spread across 3 distinct art units, which points to a portfolio that covers several different technical aspects of the semiconductor and optics fields. The company's prosecution strategy involves 8 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter is reviewed by a different individual.

The busiest examiner, HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN, is currently handling 1 pending office action. Given the total volume of active cases, the workload is perfectly distributed among the examiners. This level of diversification across 3 distinct art units means that the company is not dependent on the discretion of any single examiner. Practitioners should be ready to manage separate prosecution timelines and adapt to the specific styles of each person. While this variety requires coordination, it also provides multiple opportunities to secure patent rights. The absence of examiner overlap suggests that the outcomes of the pending office actions will likely be independent of each other.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (70%)
3
Medium (30%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only3 (30%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
20% of docket
5
Semiconductors
50% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
30% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BROOME, SHARRIEF I 1 81.5% +4.5%
CATO, MIYA J 1 76.7% +12.7%
HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN 1 70.2% +43.1%
CAI, PHUONG HAU 1 76.9% +26.4%
SALEH, ZAID MUHAMMAD 1 65.0% +46.7%
WILKES, ZACHARY W 1 66.6% +22.4%
NIGAM, NATASHA 1 58.1% +31.8%
DINH, JACK 1 85.0% +6.5%
SAHLE, MAHIDERE S 1 79.5% +13.1%
PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 1 80.7% +17.9%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18460111 OCT DEVICE WILKES, ZACHARY W 16d overdue
19105871 SUBJECTIVE OPTOMETRY SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING SUBJECTIVE OPTOMETRY PROGRAM BROOME, SHARRIEF I —
18970913 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CATO, MIYA J —
18896688 OCT IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING OCT IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM AND OCT IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN —
18403357 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CAI, PHUONG HAU —
18193148 OPHTHALMIC APPARATUS DINH, JACK —
17915356 OPTOMETRY SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM PINKNEY, DAWAYNE —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18460111 OCT DEVICE WILKES, ZACHARY W 16d overdue
18345423 OCT APPARATUS NIGAM, NATASHA 13d
18477067 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD SALEH, ZAID MUHAMMAD 69d
18970913 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CATO, MIYA J —
18896688 OCT IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING OCT IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM AND OCT IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN —
18403357 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CAI, PHUONG HAU —
17994611 EYE EXAMINATION DEVICE, ATTACHMENT, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM SAHLE, MAHIDERE S —
17915356 OPTOMETRY SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM PINKNEY, DAWAYNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2872 5
2673 1
2668 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19105871 SUBJECTIVE OPTOMETRY SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING SUBJECTIVE OPTOMETRY PROGRAM BROOME, SHARRIEF I — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 24, 2025
18970913 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CATO, MIYA J — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18896688 OCT IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING OCT IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM AND OCT IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD HELCO, NICHOLAS JOHN — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18403357 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM CAI, PHUONG HAU 2673 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 03, 2024
18477067 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD SALEH, ZAID MUHAMMAD 2668 §103 Final Rejection 69d Pending Sep 28, 2023
18460111 OCT DEVICE WILKES, ZACHARY W 2872 §102§103 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Sep 01, 2023
18345423 OCT APPARATUS NIGAM, NATASHA 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 13d Pending Jun 30, 2023
18193148 OPHTHALMIC APPARATUS DINH, JACK 2872 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 30, 2023
17994611 EYE EXAMINATION DEVICE, ATTACHMENT, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM SAHLE, MAHIDERE S 2872 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 28, 2022
17915356 OPTOMETRY SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 2872 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 28, 2022

Managing Nidek Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month