Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Brainspark Associates, LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 4 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

BrainSpark Associates, LLC has 13 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 637 career applications. The current workload is supported by a defined application history in the reported technical area.

The resolved allowance rate is 81.87%, and the average is 3.16 office actions per allowance. The results indicate that allowance is achieved in a substantial share of resolved matters, while the average reflects multiple examination exchanges in the typical path. Clients should account for both the recorded outcome pattern and the associated response work.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=637 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.9%
Allowance Rate
n=637
+0.29σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=637
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=316
-0.12σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=316
1069 days
Time to Allowance
n=316
+15.2pp
Interview Lift
n=637
18.6%
RCE Rate
n=637
2.3%
Appeal Rate
n=637

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.8%
§101 Overcome
n=58
69.2%
§102 Overcome
n=185
70.2%
§103 Overcome
n=238
71.6%
§112 Overcome
n=204

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61F, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
50%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=637
1
Practitioners
n=637
637.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=637

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (23%)
2
Easy (15%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (15%)
§103 only2 (15%)
§102 only1 (8%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (46%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
23% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
69% of docket
1
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA 3 78.3% +11.4%
SIPP, AMY R. 2 71.1% +26.0%
MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 2 68.5% +48.1%
GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1 35.0% +10.2%
TON, MARTIN TRUYEN 1 62.3% +34.4%
MATTHEWS, TESSA M 1 82.9% +24.0%
SKIBINSKY, ANNA 1 39.1% +29.3%
FUELLING, MICHAEL 1 44.1% +31.1%
PHAN, DOAN THI-THUC 1 42.8% +47.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18611512 BONE GROWTH ENHANCEMENT CONTAINMENT DEVICE MATTHEWS, TESSA M —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17398984 HYBRID SPINAL CAGES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. 141d overdue
18373185 SPINAL MOTION RESTORATION HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA 42d overdue
19076602 INSTRUMENTATION FOR TOTAL SPINAL JOINT REPLACEMENT SIPP, AMY R. —
19022676 BIOFOULING PROTECTION OF ELEVATED VOLUME/VELOCITY FLOWS GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN —
18371334 SURGICAL METHOD FOR RESTORING SPINAL ALIGNMENT AND/OR RANGE OF MOTION MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L —
18236367 RESTORING SPINAL ALIGNMENT AND/OR RANGE OF MOTION MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L —
18226979 ROBOTIC & NAVIGATION ASSISTED TOTAL SPINAL JOINT REPLACEMENT SKIBINSKY, ANNA —
17472456 BIOFOULING PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURES PHAN, DOAN THI-THUC —

Interview Candidates (13)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17398984 HYBRID SPINAL CAGES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. 141d overdue
18373185 SPINAL MOTION RESTORATION HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA 42d overdue
18594385 POSTERIOR TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA 30d overdue
19076602 INSTRUMENTATION FOR TOTAL SPINAL JOINT REPLACEMENT SIPP, AMY R. —
19022676 BIOFOULING PROTECTION OF ELEVATED VOLUME/VELOCITY FLOWS GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN —
18666753 FIXED SWAGED SOFT SUTURE METHODS & APPARATUS TON, MARTIN TRUYEN —
18611512 BONE GROWTH ENHANCEMENT CONTAINMENT DEVICE MATTHEWS, TESSA M —
18371334 SURGICAL METHOD FOR RESTORING SPINAL ALIGNMENT AND/OR RANGE OF MOTION MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37736
37752
17721
37961
16351
39921
16131

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19076602 INSTRUMENTATION FOR TOTAL SPINAL JOINT REPLACEMENT 3Spine, Inc. SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2025
19022676 BIOFOULING PROTECTION OF ELEVATED VOLUME/VELOCITY FLOWS Biofouling Technologies, Inc. GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1772 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
18666753 FIXED SWAGED SOFT SUTURE METHODS & APPARATUS Riverpoint Medical, LLC TON, MARTIN TRUYEN 3796 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2024
18611512 BONE GROWTH ENHANCEMENT CONTAINMENT DEVICE Ctl Medical Corporation MATTHEWS, TESSA M 3773 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 20, 2024
18594385 POSTERIOR TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT 3Spine, Inc. HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA 3773 §102Other Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Mar 04, 2024
18373185 SPINAL MOTION RESTORATION 3Spine, Inc. HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA 3773 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Sep 26, 2023
18371334 SURGICAL METHOD FOR RESTORING SPINAL ALIGNMENT AND/OR RANGE OF MOTION 3Spine, Inc. MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 3773 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 21, 2023
18236367 RESTORING SPINAL ALIGNMENT AND/OR RANGE OF MOTION 3Spine, Inc. MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 3773 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 21, 2023
18232557 TOTAL SPINAL JOINT SYSTEMS WITH DISSIMILAR BEARING MATERIALS 3Spine, Inc. HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA 3773 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 10, 2023
18226979 ROBOTIC & NAVIGATION ASSISTED TOTAL SPINAL JOINT REPLACEMENT 3Spine, Inc. SKIBINSKY, ANNA 1635 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 27, 2023
18226727 METHODS, SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR IMPROVING THE ACCURACY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SPINAL MOTION RESTORATION AND ALIGNMENT 3Spine, Inc. FUELLING, MICHAEL 3992 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2023
17472456 BIOFOULING PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURES Biofouling Technologies, Inc. PHAN, DOAN THI-THUC 1613 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 10, 2021
17398984 HYBRID SPINAL CAGES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS Ctl Medical Corporation SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §103§112 Final Rejection 141d overdue Pending Aug 10, 2021

Managing Brainspark Associates, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Brainspark Associates, LLC's patent allowance rate?

81.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Brainspark Associates, LLC were allowed, across 637 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Brainspark Associates, LLC average before allowance?

3.16 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Brainspark Associates, LLC have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 9 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month