Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Braxton Ip Pllc

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 8 clients • 8 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Braxton IP PLLC focuses on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm has a career history of 581 applications. Currently, there are 7 pending office actions, representing the firm's active workload.

The firm's resolved allowance rate is 81.06 percent. On average, it takes 3.51 office actions to reach an allowance. This average suggests a standard prosecution cycle involving several interactions with the patent office for mechanical and e-commerce systems. The 81.06 percent allowance rate shows a solid record of securing patent rights. With 7 pending actions, the firm's current workload is focused on a few active cases. Practitioners can use the 3.51 average and the 581 career applications to estimate the timeline and effort required for applications in these technology areas. These figures provide a clear baseline for the firm's prosecution performance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=581 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.1%
Allowance Rate
n=581
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=581
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=291
-0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=291
917 days
Time to Allowance
n=291
+12.3pp
Interview Lift
n=581
25.4%
RCE Rate
n=581
5.6%
Appeal Rate
n=581

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.2%
§101 Overcome
n=57
72.2%
§102 Overcome
n=176
71.6%
§103 Overcome
n=261
70.7%
§112 Overcome
n=225

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, B65D, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
10%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=581
0
Practitioners
n=581
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=581 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (56%)
2
Medium (22%)
2
Easy (22%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (11%)
§103 only1 (11%)
§112 only2 (22%)
Double-patenting + other1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (44%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
11% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
2
Business / Other
22% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PAL, PRINCE 2 70.8% +16.5%
GUTMAN, HILARY L 1 71.8% +11.8%
MIKAILOFF, STEFAN 1 42.7% +29.1%
PATEL, NEHA 1 23.2% +21.0%
TOOMER, CEPHIA D 1 74.4% +2.5%
RODRIGUEZ, CRIS LOIREN 1 26.3% +11.4%
SOSNOWSKI, DAVID E 1 67.6% +12.5%
IGBOKWE, NICHOLAS E 1 81.0% +13.8%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18905757 Shaker System and Method PAL, PRINCE 147d overdue
18143477 System and Method for Ascertaining Location IGBOKWE, NICHOLAS E 58d overdue
18369098 BODY SUPPORT ARTICLE COVER CONTAINING SEGMENTS FROM STITCHING OR QUILTING AND HAVING GEL-TYPE STRUCTURES INTEGRATED WITH FOAM SOSNOWSKI, DAVID E 28d
19435871 RATCHET SYSTEM GUTMAN, HILARY L —
18743469 DYNAMIC FRONT END USER INTERFACE GENERATION SYSTEM WITH SHARED MULTI-LAYERED BACK END ARCHITECTURE PATEL, NEHA —
18710743 A NEW CANNULA PROTECTOR RODRIGUEZ, CRIS LOIREN —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18905757 Shaker System and Method PAL, PRINCE 147d overdue
18143477 System and Method for Ascertaining Location IGBOKWE, NICHOLAS E 58d overdue
19316275 A TOROIDAL, MODULAR, AMPLIFIED WIND POWER GENERATION SYSTEM UTILIZING BERNOULLI PASSIVE WIND AMPLIFICATION SURFACES AND COUPLED-VORTEX COMPONENT POSITIONING OF MULTIPLE ADJUSTABLE STANDALONE VAWT TURBINES AND VANES ON A PASSIVELY YAWABLE TRACK MIKAILOFF, STEFAN 9d overdue
19010768 Shaker System and Method PAL, PRINCE 23d
18369098 BODY SUPPORT ARTICLE COVER CONTAINING SEGMENTS FROM STITCHING OR QUILTING AND HAVING GEL-TYPE STRUCTURES INTEGRATED WITH FOAM SOSNOWSKI, DAVID E 28d
19435871 RATCHET SYSTEM GUTMAN, HILARY L —
18743469 DYNAMIC FRONT END USER INTERFACE GENERATION SYSTEM WITH SHARED MULTI-LAYERED BACK END ARCHITECTURE PATEL, NEHA —
18710743 A NEW CANNULA PROTECTOR RODRIGUEZ, CRIS LOIREN —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37352
36121
28341
36991
36731
37311

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19435871 RATCHET SYSTEM Jti Supplies LLC GUTMAN, HILARY L 3612 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2025
19316275 A TOROIDAL, MODULAR, AMPLIFIED WIND POWER GENERATION SYSTEM UTILIZING BERNOULLI PASSIVE WIND AMPLIFICATION SURFACES AND COUPLED-VORTEX COMPONENT POSITIONING OF MULTIPLE ADJUSTABLE STANDALONE VAWT TURBINES AND VANES ON A PASSIVELY YAWABLE TRACK V3 Technologies, LLC MIKAILOFF, STEFAN 2834 §112Other Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Sep 02, 2025
19010768 Shaker System and Method Dallager Mccarthy Holdings PAL, PRINCE 3735 §103DP Final Rejection 23d Pending Jan 06, 2025
18905757 Shaker System and Method Dallager Mccarthy Holdings PAL, PRINCE 3735 §102§112 Final Rejection 147d overdue Pending Oct 03, 2024
18743469 DYNAMIC FRONT END USER INTERFACE GENERATION SYSTEM WITH SHARED MULTI-LAYERED BACK END ARCHITECTURE Scrap It Technology, LLC PATEL, NEHA 3699 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 14, 2024
18666469 FRICTION REDUCER AND SCALE INHIBITOR Obsidian Chemical Solutions, LLC TOOMER, CEPHIA D §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2024
18710743 A NEW CANNULA PROTECTOR Resqdevices Pty Ltd. RODRIGUEZ, CRIS LOIREN §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 16, 2024
18369098 BODY SUPPORT ARTICLE COVER CONTAINING SEGMENTS FROM STITCHING OR QUILTING AND HAVING GEL-TYPE STRUCTURES INTEGRATED WITH FOAM Elements International Group, LLC SOSNOWSKI, DAVID E 3673 §102§112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Sep 15, 2023
18143477 System and Method for Ascertaining Location Mckelley Equipment, LLC IGBOKWE, NICHOLAS E 3731 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 58d overdue Pending May 04, 2023

Managing Braxton Ip Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month