Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Breiner & Breiner, LLC

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

12 pending office actions • 6 clients • 12 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C. has 11 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 850 career applications. The current docket is supported by a defined prosecution history.

The resolved allowance rate is 77.81%, with an average of 2.68 office actions per allowance. The outcome figure shows allowance in a substantial share of resolved matters, while the response average indicates a path that generally involves fewer than three office-action exchanges. The data supports practical planning around both resolution prospects and response workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=850 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.8%
Allowance Rate
n=850
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=850
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=554
-0.32σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=554
1007 days
Time to Allowance
n=554
+7.2pp
Interview Lift
n=850
16.4%
RCE Rate
n=850
4.6%
Appeal Rate
n=850

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

52.2%
§101 Overcome
n=23
71.9%
§102 Overcome
n=199
71.9%
§103 Overcome
n=317
79.7%
§112 Overcome
n=227

Specialization & Scale

B65H, Y10T, B31F
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=850
0
Practitioners
n=850
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=850 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)11 (92%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
8% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
92% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FOSTER, NICHOLAS L 1 75.5% +24.6%
FRY, PATRICK B 1 54.1% +8.2%
DIAS, RAVEEN J 1 80.7% +17.0%
VERA, ELISA H 1 72.4% +26.3%
SINGH, KAVEL 1 83.7% +14.0%
SAHNI, VISHAL R 1 75.4% +18.9%
MATTHEWS, JENNIFER S 1 54.3% +21.7%
CORNETT, ROBERT D 1 40.4% +42.5%
SEIF, DARIUSH 1 70.7% +6.1%
DO, NHAT CHIEU Q 1 64.0% +48.7%

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18536706 DEVICE WITH ROTATING BLADES, MACHINE COMPRISING SAID DEVICE, AND RELATED METHOD DO, NHAT CHIEU Q 78d overdue
17765075 CUTTING MACHINE FOR PRODUCTS MADE OF CELLULOSE MATERIAL AND RELATED METHOD MACFARLANE, EVAN H 19d overdue
18680102 METHOD OF LOWERING A STREAM OF BOARDS SINGH, KAVEL 16d overdue
18716240 EMBOSSING DEVICE FOR EMBOSSING A CELLULOSE WEB MATERIAL AND RELATED METHOD VERA, ELISA H 9d
18577364 SYSTEM FOR PACKING TISSUE PAPER PRODUCTS IN WRAPPING SHEETS SEIF, DARIUSH 28d
19357901 SIDE WALL SEAL FOR PIPING FOSTER, NICHOLAS L —
19114121 PACKAGING MACHINE WITH SEALING DEVICE FOR PAPER WRAPPING MATERIALS FRY, PATRICK B —
18869407 LINE FOR PRODUCING TUBES MADE OF WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DIAS, RAVEEN J —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18536706 DEVICE WITH ROTATING BLADES, MACHINE COMPRISING SAID DEVICE, AND RELATED METHOD DO, NHAT CHIEU Q 78d overdue
18680102 METHOD OF LOWERING A STREAM OF BOARDS SINGH, KAVEL 16d overdue
18716240 EMBOSSING DEVICE FOR EMBOSSING A CELLULOSE WEB MATERIAL AND RELATED METHOD VERA, ELISA H 9d
19357901 SIDE WALL SEAL FOR PIPING FOSTER, NICHOLAS L —
18869407 LINE FOR PRODUCING TUBES MADE OF WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DIAS, RAVEEN J —
18630596 VIBRATION ISOLATION ASSEMBLY SAHNI, VISHAL R —
18689158 A DEVICE FOR CLAMPING LOGS DURING CUTTING, LOG SAW COMPRISING THE DEVICE AND METHOD MATTHEWS, JENNIFER S —
18687425 A ROTATING BLADE DEVICE, A MACHINE COMPRISING SAID DEVICE, AND METHOD CORNETT, ROBERT D —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37244
37312
36751
36541
17481
36511
36161
37151

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19357901 SIDE WALL SEAL FOR PIPING Roof Goose Vent LLC FOSTER, NICHOLAS L 3675 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 14, 2025
19114121 PACKAGING MACHINE WITH SEALING DEVICE FOR PAPER WRAPPING MATERIALS VALMET TISSUE CONVERTING S.P.A. FRY, PATRICK B 3731 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2025
18869407 LINE FOR PRODUCING TUBES MADE OF WEB-LIKE MATERIAL VALMET TISSUE CONVERTING S.P.A. DIAS, RAVEEN J 3654 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18716240 EMBOSSING DEVICE FOR EMBOSSING A CELLULOSE WEB MATERIAL AND RELATED METHOD VALMET TISSUE CONVERTING S.P.A. VERA, ELISA H 1748 §102§103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Jun 04, 2024
18680102 METHOD OF LOWERING A STREAM OF BOARDS Automated Industrial Technologies, Inc. SINGH, KAVEL 3651 §102§103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending May 31, 2024
18630596 VIBRATION ISOLATION ASSEMBLY Roof Goose Vent LLC SAHNI, VISHAL R 3616 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 09, 2024
18689158 A DEVICE FOR CLAMPING LOGS DURING CUTTING, LOG SAW COMPRISING THE DEVICE AND METHOD VALMET TISSUE CONVERTING S.P.A. MATTHEWS, JENNIFER S 3724 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 05, 2024
18687425 A ROTATING BLADE DEVICE, A MACHINE COMPRISING SAID DEVICE, AND METHOD VALMET TISSUE CONVERTING S.P.A. CORNETT, ROBERT D 3724 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2024
18577364 SYSTEM FOR PACKING TISSUE PAPER PRODUCTS IN WRAPPING SHEETS VALMET TISSUE CONVERTING S.P.A. SEIF, DARIUSH 3731 §103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jan 08, 2024
18536706 DEVICE WITH ROTATING BLADES, MACHINE COMPRISING SAID DEVICE, AND RELATED METHOD VALMET TISSUE CONVERTING S.P.A. DO, NHAT CHIEU Q 3724 §103§112 Non-Final OA 78d overdue Pending Dec 12, 2023
18388710 METHOD AND SMART BALL FOR GENERATING AN AUDIO FEEDBACK FOR A USER INTERACTING WITH THE SMART BALL Iotis GmbH GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 3715 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 10, 2023
17765075 CUTTING MACHINE FOR PRODUCTS MADE OF CELLULOSE MATERIAL AND RELATED METHOD Korber Tissue S.p.A. MACFARLANE, EVAN H 3724 §103§112 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Mar 30, 2022

Managing Breiner & Breiner, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Breiner & Breiner, LLC's patent allowance rate?

77.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Breiner & Breiner, LLC were allowed, across 850 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Breiner & Breiner, LLC average before allowance?

2.68 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Breiner & Breiner, LLC have?

12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 12 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month