Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Briggs Intellectual Property Law

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

9 pending office actions • 9 clients • 9 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 31 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Briggs Intellectual Property Law has 7 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 172 career applications. The profile provides a defined application base for the current workload.

The resolved allowance rate is 67.23%, with an average of 1.8 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters reach allowance less often than profiles with higher reported rates, while the response average indicates a relatively short examination path for matters that do proceed through the record. Practitioners should consider both dimensions when evaluating prosecution expectations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=172 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

67.2%
Allowance Rate
n=172
+0.18σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=172
1.8
OAs to Allowance
n=80
-0.82σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=80
797 days
Time to Allowance
n=80
+22.5pp
Interview Lift
n=172
18.5%
RCE Rate
n=172
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=172

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=17 (min 20)
54.4%
§102 Overcome
n=46
40.5%
§103 Overcome
n=84
43.5%
§112 Overcome
n=46

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, F03D
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=172
0
Practitioners
n=172
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=172 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (44%)
4
Medium (44%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (11%)
§103 only4 (44%)
Double-patenting only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
22% of docket
2
Information Tech
22% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
22% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AGUDELO, PAOLA 1 76.9% +17.1%
GEHMAN, BRYON P 1 73.7% +30.6%
FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1 44.2% +2.5%
GANI, OBAIDUL NMN 1 100.0% +0.0%
ABYANEH, ALI S 1 77.6% +56.1%
MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD 1 84.1% +11.2%
PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1 28.4% +27.4%
DAO, TUAN C. 1 82.1% +15.5%
KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE 1 84.6% +23.3%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18064017 BODY SUPPORT APPARATUS KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE 24d overdue
18804709 MINERAL SEPARATION SYSTEM MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD —
18670317 DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM DAO, TUAN C. —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19054030 ANCHOR SYSTEM AGUDELO, PAOLA —
18926928 CABLE GLAND SYSTEM GANI, OBAIDUL NMN —
18909240 AUTONOMOUS THREAT OPERATION SYSTEM ABYANEH, ALI S —
18796725 SWEAT WICKING AND ABSORBING DEVICE PIZIALI, ANDREW T —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18064017 BODY SUPPORT APPARATUS KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE 24d overdue
19046589 FLEXIBLE FLUID RESERVOIR SYSTEM GEHMAN, BRYON P 4d overdue
19054030 ANCHOR SYSTEM AGUDELO, PAOLA —
18909240 AUTONOMOUS THREAT OPERATION SYSTEM ABYANEH, ALI S —
18804709 MINERAL SEPARATION SYSTEM MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD —
18796725 SWEAT WICKING AND ABSORBING DEVICE PIZIALI, ANDREW T —
18670317 DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM DAO, TUAN C. —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36331
37361
17491
28471
24371
36531
17891
21981
28811

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19054030 ANCHOR SYSTEM Wood'S Pool Service AGUDELO, PAOLA 3633 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2025
19046589 FLEXIBLE FLUID RESERVOIR SYSTEM Appalachia Design GEHMAN, BRYON P 3736 DP Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Feb 06, 2025
18932769 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION Signal Engineering Consulting LLC FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1749 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18926928 CABLE GLAND SYSTEM Aggietech Capital LLC GANI, OBAIDUL NMN 2847 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18909240 AUTONOMOUS THREAT OPERATION SYSTEM Simbian, Inc. ABYANEH, ALI S 2437 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18804709 MINERAL SEPARATION SYSTEM Mason-Grey Corporation MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD 3653 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2024
18796725 SWEAT WICKING AND ABSORBING DEVICE Bougiene PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1789 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2024
18670317 DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM Skymel Inc. DAO, TUAN C. 2198 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 21, 2024
18064017 BODY SUPPORT APPARATUS Beyond Centerline Solutions KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE 2881 §103 Non-Final OA 24d overdue Pending Dec 09, 2022

Managing Briggs Intellectual Property Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Briggs Intellectual Property Law's patent allowance rate?

67.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Briggs Intellectual Property Law were allowed, across 172 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Briggs Intellectual Property Law average before allowance?

1.80 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Briggs Intellectual Property Law have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 9 clients, before 9 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month