Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

24 pending office actions • 16 clients • 24 examiners • 19 art units • 0 of 24 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 46 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville has 24 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 1420 career applications. The profile combines a current open docket with a broader application record in the same technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.63%, and the average is 3.42 office actions per allowance. The data describes resolved prosecution that frequently reaches allowance, with multiple office actions commonly occurring along the way. Practitioners can use the figures to plan responses, monitor examination duration, and identify matters where transportation, commerce, or mechanical claim issues remain active.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1420 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.6%
Allowance Rate
n=1420
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1420
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=850
-0.17σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=850
1019 days
Time to Allowance
n=850
+5.7pp
Interview Lift
n=1420
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=1420
2.6%
Appeal Rate
n=1420

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.2%
§101 Overcome
n=113
78.7%
§102 Overcome
n=413
79.0%
§103 Overcome
n=647
83.0%
§112 Overcome
n=481

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, E06B, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1420
1
Practitioners
n=1420
1420.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1420

Portfolio Summary

24
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
10
Final Rejections
3
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
5
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (5)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (46%)
9
Medium (38%)
3
Easy (12%)
1
Unknown (4%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (4%)
§101 + other4 (17%)
§103 only8 (33%)
§102 only1 (4%)
Double-patenting only3 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (25%)
No statute on record1 (4%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
4% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
8% of docket
2
Semiconductors
8% of docket
18
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
4% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

240 h
Manual time on pending OAs
48 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
84 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TWEEL JR, JOHN ALEXANDER 1 82.7% +10.2%
TORRES, ALICIA M 1 73.7% +17.3%
FERDOUS, ZANNATUL 1 84.4% +16.7%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 1 45.5% +27.0%
JARIWALA, CHIRAG 1 62.1% +27.5%
DEVITO, ALEX T 1 72.2% +12.2%
AYALA DELGADO, ANTHONY 1 79.7% +17.1%
MOORE, REVA R 1 52.9% +50.0%
MARSH, STEVEN M 1 79.5% +7.2%
WHITAKER, ANDREW B 1 18.7% +18.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19270920 DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER RISK TWEEL JR, JOHN ALEXANDER —
19082805 SOIL MOISTURE AND NUTRIENT SENSOR SYSTEM FERDOUS, ZANNATUL —

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18176748 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER RISK SWARTZ, STEPHEN S 113d overdue
18594663 TILE AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE HIJAZ, OMAR F 22d
18918341 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER FATIGUE WHITAKER, ANDREW B 29d
19224117 SEED INJECTOR SYSTEM TORRES, ALICIA M —
19108951 SYSTEM & ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES KANG, TIMOTHY J —
19016429 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF SOIL NUTRIENTS AND MOISTURE DEVITO, ALEX T —
19002528 DATA NETWORK MOORE, REVA R —
18931983 SUPPORT SLEEVE FOR A FIREFIGHTING ACCESSORY MARSH, STEVEN M —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19005123 MIXED FUEL SYSTEM AYALA DELGADO, ANTHONY 43d overdue
18918341 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER FATIGUE WHITAKER, ANDREW B 29d
19270920 DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER RISK TWEEL JR, JOHN ALEXANDER —
19224117 SEED INJECTOR SYSTEM TORRES, ALICIA M —
19082805 SOIL MOISTURE AND NUTRIENT SENSOR SYSTEM FERDOUS, ZANNATUL —
19108951 SYSTEM & ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES KANG, TIMOTHY J —
19064916 DUAL ENGINE PARALLEL PUMPING TRAILER SYSTEM JARIWALA, CHIRAG —
19016429 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF SOIL NUTRIENTS AND MOISTURE DEVITO, ALEX T —

Client Portfolio (16 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37462
36272
36552
36352
26891
36711
28581
36881
28551
36321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19270920 DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER RISK Makusafe Corp. TWEEL JR, JOHN ALEXANDER 2689 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2025
19224117 SEED INJECTOR SYSTEM Reenvision AG, LLC TORRES, ALICIA M 3671 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2025
19082805 SOIL MOISTURE AND NUTRIENT SENSOR SYSTEM Nutriprobe, LLC FERDOUS, ZANNATUL 2858 DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 18, 2025
19108951 SYSTEM & ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES Tri Force Management Applications, LLC KANG, TIMOTHY J 3688 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 05, 2025
19064916 DUAL ENGINE PARALLEL PUMPING TRAILER SYSTEM Revolution Equipment Rental Limited Liability Company JARIWALA, CHIRAG 3746 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 27, 2025
19016429 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF SOIL NUTRIENTS AND MOISTURE Nutriprobe, LLC DEVITO, ALEX T 2855 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 10, 2025
19005123 MIXED FUEL SYSTEM American Power Group, Inc. AYALA DELGADO, ANTHONY 3746 DP Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Dec 30, 2024
19002528 DATA NETWORK Nb Ventures, Inc., Dba Gep MOORE, REVA R 3627 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 26, 2024
18931983 SUPPORT SLEEVE FOR A FIREFIGHTING ACCESSORY American Fire Equipment, Inc. MARSH, STEVEN M 3632 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18918341 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER FATIGUE Makusafe Corp. WHITAKER, ANDREW B 3629 §101§102§103Other Non-Final OA 29d Pending Oct 17, 2024
18826522 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INSTALLATION OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS Ingher Investments, LLC JOERGER, KAITLIN S 3655 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18813304 SELF-OPENING AIRTIGHT ROOF VENT SYSTEM FOR GRAIN STORAGE DEVICES Sukup Manufacturing Co. LIN, KO-WEI 3762 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18670231 STONE OR PORCELAIN TILE Mbrico, LLC SADLON, JOSEPH 3635 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending May 21, 2024
18652989 WATER CURTAIN NOZZLE American Fire Equipment, Inc. FORD, RENE D 3741 §102 Final Rejection 70d Pending May 02, 2024
18601072 FILL NOZZLE American Fire Equipment, Inc. ZADEH, BOB 3754 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Mar 11, 2024
18594663 TILE AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE Mbrico, LLC HIJAZ, OMAR F 3635 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Mar 04, 2024
18411208 VOLUMETRIC MIXER WITH PIVOTABLE CHUTE Cemen Tech, Inc. INSLER, ELIZABETH §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 12, 2024
18409204 DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER RISK Makusafe Corp. POPE, KHARYE 2693 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 10, 2024
18400317 LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL (LLM) BASED DATA PROCESSING IN PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN APPLICATIONS DEVELOPED BY CODELESS PLATFORM Nb Ventures, Inc. Dba Gep SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR 3627 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 29, 2023
18499929 CONTAINMENT UNIT Mobile Road Service Solutions, LLC KEENAN, JAMES W 3655 §103 Final Rejection 19d Pending Nov 01, 2023
18465807 MULTI-MODALITY MOLECULAR IMAGING PROBE, AND PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOF Lanzhou University LEWOCZKO, EVAN MICHAEL 1612 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 12, 2023
18180519 STOCHASTIC ECONOMIC EVALUATION TOOL Partners For Production Agriculture, LLC BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE 3624 — Final Rejection — Pending Mar 08, 2023
18176748 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING WORKER RISK Makusafe Corp. SWARTZ, STEPHEN S 3625 §101§103 Non-Final OA 113d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2023
18148605 QUERY LANGUAGE TOOL BASED SELF DRIVEN SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING ENTERPRISE AND SUPPLY CHAIN APPLICATIONS Nb Ventures, Inc. Dba Gep ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA 3623 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2022

Managing Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville's patent allowance rate?

88.6% of resolved applications prosecuted by Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville were allowed, across 1,420 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville average before allowance?

3.42 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville have?

24 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 16 clients, before 24 examiners in 19 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month