Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 1 client • 8 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Burr & Forman LLP - FGTL has 11 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 338 career applications. The profile shows current examination activity within a smaller application record for this technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 46.06%, and the average is 2.89 office actions per allowance. Resolved applications reach allowance at the reported rate, while the average indicates that allowance generally follows multiple office actions. Practitioners should give particular attention to response development and claim strategy in the pending transportation, commerce, and mechanical matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=338 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

46.1%
Allowance Rate
n=338
-0.14σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=338
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=76
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=76
893 days
Time to Allowance
n=76
-19.2pp
Interview Lift
n=338
43.6%
RCE Rate
n=338
4.0%
Appeal Rate
n=338

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=17 (min 20)
28.8%
§102 Overcome
n=111
21.5%
§103 Overcome
n=200
27.4%
§112 Overcome
n=102

Specialization & Scale

B29C, B62D, B33Y
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=338
0
Practitioners
n=338
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=338 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (78%)
2
Medium (22%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (22%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (78%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
89% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAHNI, VISHAL R 2 75.4% +18.9%
KECK, DANIEL M 1 82.2% +19.1%
BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH 1 81.7% +13.5%
GILBERT, WILLIAM V 1 58.0% +25.8%
BAILEY, JOHN D 1 79.2% +16.7%
MILLER, CAITLIN ANNE 1 89.6% +9.0%
COMINO, EVA L 1 70.4% +32.3%
BURCH, MELODY M 1 64.2% +26.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19040286 WHEEL SLIP CONTROLS AND RESPONSE TO TIRE PRESSURE BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18538142 BRAKE DUST SHIELD DESIGN FOR BRAKE DUST SHIELD ROBUSTNESS BURCH, MELODY M 29d
18581022 WHEEL COVER RETENTION ASSEMBLY COMINO, EVA L 34d
19052467 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS WITH AN INTEGRATED FLUID PASSAGE KECK, DANIEL M —
18956183 LUG NUT UTILIZING OPEN-FRAME DESIGNS GILBERT, WILLIAM V —
18623398 COMBINED MOTOR ROTOR AND WHEEL RIM ASSEMBLY MILLER, CAITLIN ANNE —
18581761 BRAKE ARCHITECTURE FOR PARKING BRAKE BACKUP RESPONSE SAHNI, VISHAL R —
18515573 SPRING ISOLATOR PAD WITH INTEGRATED SPRING ROTATION STOP AND PAD ROTATION STOP SAHNI, VISHAL R —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18538142 BRAKE DUST SHIELD DESIGN FOR BRAKE DUST SHIELD ROBUSTNESS BURCH, MELODY M 29d
18581022 WHEEL COVER RETENTION ASSEMBLY COMINO, EVA L 34d
18800541 BRAKE ASSIST FOR HOLDING TORQUE WITHIN A BRAKE ASSEMBLY BAILEY, JOHN D 43d
19052467 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS WITH AN INTEGRATED FLUID PASSAGE KECK, DANIEL M —
19040286 WHEEL SLIP CONTROLS AND RESPONSE TO TIRE PRESSURE BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH —
18956183 LUG NUT UTILIZING OPEN-FRAME DESIGNS GILBERT, WILLIAM V —
18581761 BRAKE ARCHITECTURE FOR PARKING BRAKE BACKUP RESPONSE SAHNI, VISHAL R —
18515573 SPRING ISOLATOR PAD WITH INTEGRATED SPRING ROTATION STOP AND PAD ROTATION STOP SAHNI, VISHAL R —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Ford 9

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36163
36142
37472
39931
36151

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19052467 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS WITH AN INTEGRATED FLUID PASSAGE Ford Global Technologies, LLC KECK, DANIEL M 3614 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 13, 2025
19040286 WHEEL SLIP CONTROLS AND RESPONSE TO TIRE PRESSURE Ford Global Technologies, LLC BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH 3747 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 29, 2025
18956183 LUG NUT UTILIZING OPEN-FRAME DESIGNS Ford Global Technologies, LLC GILBERT, WILLIAM V 3993 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2024
18800541 BRAKE ASSIST FOR HOLDING TORQUE WITHIN A BRAKE ASSEMBLY Ford Global Technologies, LLC BAILEY, JOHN D 3747 §103 Final Rejection 43d Pending Aug 12, 2024
18623398 COMBINED MOTOR ROTOR AND WHEEL RIM ASSEMBLY Ford Global Technologies, LLC MILLER, CAITLIN ANNE 3614 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18581761 BRAKE ARCHITECTURE FOR PARKING BRAKE BACKUP RESPONSE Ford Global Technologies, LLC SAHNI, VISHAL R 3616 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 20, 2024
18581022 WHEEL COVER RETENTION ASSEMBLY Ford Global Technologies, LLC COMINO, EVA L 3615 §102§112 Final Rejection 34d Pending Feb 19, 2024
18538142 BRAKE DUST SHIELD DESIGN FOR BRAKE DUST SHIELD ROBUSTNESS Ford Global Technologies, LLC BURCH, MELODY M 3616 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 29d Pending Dec 13, 2023
18515573 SPRING ISOLATOR PAD WITH INTEGRATED SPRING ROTATION STOP AND PAD ROTATION STOP Ford Global Technologies, LLC SAHNI, VISHAL R 3616 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 21, 2023

Managing Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl's patent allowance rate?

46.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl were allowed, across 338 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl average before allowance?

2.89 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 8 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month