Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Chhabra Law Firm, Pc

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Chhabra Law Firm, PC (NPA) has 5 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 16 career applications. The application record is limited, so the available figures describe a focused practice profile with current activity in the technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 33.33%, and the average is 10.0 office actions per allowance. These measures indicate that allowance is recorded in a minority of resolved matters and that the allowances reported involve extensive examination activity. Practitioners should examine individual files closely when evaluating prosecution strategy, response burden, and suitability for matters with complex claim issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=16 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

—
Allowance Rate
n=16 (min 20)
—
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=16 (min 20)
—
OAs to Allowance
n=2 (min 20)
—
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=2 (min 20)
—
Time to Allowance
n=2 (min 20)
—
Interview Lift
n=16 (min 20)
—
RCE Rate
n=16 (min 20)
—
Appeal Rate
n=16 (min 20)

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)
—
§102 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)
—
§103 Overcome
n=13 (min 20)
—
§112 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, A63B
Top CPC Subclasses
—
Top-3 CPC Share
n=16 (min 20)
—
Practitioners
n=16 (min 20)
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=16 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (20%)
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VU, KHOA 1 69.6% +13.7%
GANESAN, SUNDHARA M 1 70.5% +25.3%
ZHOU, YINGYING 1 48.2% +45.8%
HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE 1 54.9% +23.9%
SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J 1 80.3% +28.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17344551 SECURE WEARABLE LENS APPARATUS SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J 70d overdue

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18747428 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FINANCIAL SIMULATIONS USING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE 19d overdue
19096671 TOWEL FOR EXERCISE MAT GANESAN, SUNDHARA M —
18927031 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING A TIME VARYING CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSFER OVER A DECENTRALIZED NETWORK ZHOU, YINGYING —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17344551 SECURE WEARABLE LENS APPARATUS SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J 70d overdue
18747428 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FINANCIAL SIMULATIONS USING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE 19d overdue
19098916 OBJECT PIXEL COUNT BASED SCREEN COVERAGE METRICS VU, KHOA —
19096671 TOWEL FOR EXERCISE MAT GANESAN, SUNDHARA M —
18927031 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING A TIME VARYING CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSFER OVER A DECENTRALIZED NETWORK ZHOU, YINGYING —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Trivver, Inc. 3
Yoga Ether LLC 1
Credit Sesame 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26111
37841
36971
36941
24931

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19098916 OBJECT PIXEL COUNT BASED SCREEN COVERAGE METRICS Trivver, Inc. VU, KHOA 2611 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 02, 2025
19096671 TOWEL FOR EXERCISE MAT Yoga Ether LLC GANESAN, SUNDHARA M 3784 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 31, 2025
18927031 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING A TIME VARYING CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSFER OVER A DECENTRALIZED NETWORK Trivver, Inc. ZHOU, YINGYING 3697 §101§103Other Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18747428 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FINANCIAL SIMULATIONS USING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL Credit Sesame, Inc. HUDSON, MARLA LAVETTE 3694 §101 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Jun 18, 2024
17344551 SECURE WEARABLE LENS APPARATUS Trivver, Inc. SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J 2493 §103 Non-Final OA 70d overdue Pending Jun 10, 2021

Managing Chhabra Law Firm, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending office actions does Chhabra Law Firm, Pc have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month