Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cole Schotz, P.C.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Networking & Security • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 6 clients • 10 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Cole Schotz, P.C. has 11 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and a career application record of 199. The profile combines a current docket with a historical application record in biotechnology and pharmaceutical subject matter.

The resolved allowance rate is 84.55%, and the average is 3.27 office actions per allowance. The first measure describes resolved outcomes, while the second shows that allowed matters typically involved several office-action exchanges. This combination gives practitioners a basis for planning prosecution resources while leaving the technical merits of each pending matter to file-specific review.

The pending docket should be examined for issues such as claim scope, written description, enablement, and cited art where relevant. The historical statistics provide context, but they do not explain why individual applications were allowed or how any particular pending matter will resolve.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=199 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.6%
Allowance Rate
n=199
+0.47σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=199
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=104
-0.25σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=104
925 days
Time to Allowance
n=104
+18.2pp
Interview Lift
n=199
37.4%
RCE Rate
n=199
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=199

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=13 (min 20)
60.0%
§102 Overcome
n=45
70.7%
§103 Overcome
n=82
71.2%
§112 Overcome
n=52

Specialization & Scale

A61L, H04W, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
44%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=199
0
Practitioners
n=199
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=199 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (30%)
5
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only2 (20%)
§102 only2 (20%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Double-patenting + other1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
40% of docket
2
Information Tech
20% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FOX, ALLISON M 1 71.0% +35.7%
MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M 1 69.2% +19.6%
MILLER, SHAWN D 1 95.7% +6.0%
SIDDIQUI, KASHIF 1 88.1% +8.5%
WERTZ, ASHLEE ELIZABETH 1 52.7% +35.6%
NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 1 30.1% +39.8%
DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE 1 48.1% +45.2%
MILLER-CRUZ, EKANDRA S. 1 66.1% +51.3%
MENSH, ANDREW J 1 64.5% +19.2%
PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 1 64.9% +19.1%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18958574 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HANDLING LCP RESTRICTIONS AND HARQ PROCESS NUMBER MILLER, SHAWN D —
18816269 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIDELINK OPERATION SIDDIQUI, KASHIF —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19013150 RACK ADAPTED TO SECURE A HOSE FOR FACILITATING THE TRANSFER OF MATERIAL TO AND FROM WATER BORNE PLATFORMS AND VESSELS MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M —
18591564 CARTILAGE-DERIVED IMPLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE —
17728384 TISSUE DERIVED IMPLANTS REHYDRATABLE WHILE DISPOSED WITHIN A DEVICE PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18792482 TAPELESS CLOSURE MECHANISM FOR SHIPPING BOXES NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 149d overdue
17940255 CATHETER COVER FOR URINARY CATHETER MENSH, ANDREW J 114d overdue
18234715 ENERGY INTEGRATED WATER PURIFICATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING SAME MILLER-CRUZ, EKANDRA S. 17d overdue
19183186 MIXTURES OF PLACENTAL PARTICLES, GRAFTS INCLUDING THEM, AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING THEM FOX, ALLISON M —
19013150 RACK ADAPTED TO SECURE A HOSE FOR FACILITATING THE TRANSFER OF MATERIAL TO AND FROM WATER BORNE PLATFORMS AND VESSELS MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M —
18807214 SHAPED AMALGAMATED CARTILAGE GRAFTS AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SAME WERTZ, ASHLEE ELIZABETH —
18591564 CARTILAGE-DERIVED IMPLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE —
17728384 TISSUE DERIVED IMPLANTS REHYDRATABLE WHILE DISPOSED WITHIN A DEVICE PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16331
37531
24121
24151
16121
37351
16311
17731
37811
37741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19183186 MIXTURES OF PLACENTAL PARTICLES, GRAFTS INCLUDING THEM, AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING THEM Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation FOX, ALLISON M 1633 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
19013150 RACK ADAPTED TO SECURE A HOSE FOR FACILITATING THE TRANSFER OF MATERIAL TO AND FROM WATER BORNE PLATFORMS AND VESSELS Red Skies Offshore LLC MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M 3753 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2025
18958574 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HANDLING LCP RESTRICTIONS AND HARQ PROCESS NUMBER Hannibal Ip LLC MILLER, SHAWN D 2412 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 25, 2024
18816269 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIDELINK OPERATION Hannibal Ip LLC SIDDIQUI, KASHIF 2415 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2024
18807214 SHAPED AMALGAMATED CARTILAGE GRAFTS AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SAME Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation WERTZ, ASHLEE ELIZABETH 1612 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18792482 TAPELESS CLOSURE MECHANISM FOR SHIPPING BOXES Packaged, LLC NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 3735 §102 Non-Final OA 149d overdue Pending Aug 01, 2024
18591564 CARTILAGE-DERIVED IMPLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE 1631 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18234715 ENERGY INTEGRATED WATER PURIFICATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING SAME Aizaco Limited Company MILLER-CRUZ, EKANDRA S. 1773 §103 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Aug 16, 2023
17940255 CATHETER COVER FOR URINARY CATHETER Dash Ip, LLC MENSH, ANDREW J 3781 §103 Non-Final OA 114d overdue Pending Sep 08, 2022
17728384 TISSUE DERIVED IMPLANTS REHYDRATABLE WHILE DISPOSED WITHIN A DEVICE Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 3774 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 25, 2022

Managing Cole Schotz, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cole Schotz, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

84.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Cole Schotz, P.C. were allowed, across 199 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Cole Schotz, P.C. average before allowance?

3.27 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Cole Schotz, P.C. have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 10 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month