Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Crose Law LLC

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 6 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

CROSE LAW LLC focuses on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm has 395 career applications and 7 pending office actions. It maintains a resolved allowance rate of 87.07 percent. On average, the firm sees 3.17 office actions per allowance. The 3.17 average indicates a prosecution cycle for the firm's clients.

The 87.07 percent allowance rate demonstrates the ability to secure patent grants for its 395 career applications. The 7 pending office actions show the current level of activity. The average of 3.17 office actions per allowance provides a metric for the expected number of rounds of communication. These data points offer an overview of the firm's effectiveness and current workload. Practitioners can use these figures to evaluate the firm's performance in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=395 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.1%
Allowance Rate
n=395
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=395
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=303
-0.09σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=303
1044 days
Time to Allowance
n=303
+5.1pp
Interview Lift
n=395
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=395
1.3%
Appeal Rate
n=395

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

74.2%
§101 Overcome
n=31
79.7%
§102 Overcome
n=138
80.6%
§103 Overcome
n=216
80.7%
§112 Overcome
n=197

Specialization & Scale

A61B, G06Q, A61F
Top CPC Subclasses
9%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=395
1
Practitioners
n=395
395.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=395

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (86%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
86% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ARANT, HARRY E 1 50.0% +21.4%
TOWNSEND, GUY K 1 74.4% +25.1%
SHIAO, YIH-HORNG 1 72.6% +75.9%
OBAID, HAMZEH M 1 37.9% +21.8%
LOIKITH, CATHERINE A 1 85.1% +7.7%
HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 1 26.7% +33.0%
EDWARDS, LOREN C 1 81.5% +29.2%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17770282 Steering Apparatus for Object Transporting Vehicles EDWARDS, LOREN C 84d overdue
18704489 COMPUTERIZED WEIGHTED PROBLEM IMPACT SCORE CALCULATION SYSTEM AND A METHOD THEREOF OBAID, HAMZEH M 26d overdue
18276874 NEGATIVE PRESSURE BASED IMAGING AND THERAPEUTIC APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR WELL-CONFINED ABNORMAL MUCOSAL TISSUE ABLATION AND WORKING METHOD OF THE SYSTEM HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 3d overdue
19045323 RECIPROCATING PANEL FOR CAPILLARY HYDRONIC MATS ARANT, HARRY E —
18848885 OPHTHALMIC IMPLANT WITH RESTRICTION MECHANISM ON A DRAINAGE TUBE FOR TREATING GLAUCOMA TOWNSEND, GUY K —
18722682 RNA/DNA ISOLATION KIT WITH HIGH EFFICIENCY SHIAO, YIH-HORNG —
18533159 LID LIFTER LOIKITH, CATHERINE A —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17770282 Steering Apparatus for Object Transporting Vehicles EDWARDS, LOREN C 84d overdue
18704489 COMPUTERIZED WEIGHTED PROBLEM IMPACT SCORE CALCULATION SYSTEM AND A METHOD THEREOF OBAID, HAMZEH M 26d overdue
18276874 NEGATIVE PRESSURE BASED IMAGING AND THERAPEUTIC APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR WELL-CONFINED ABNORMAL MUCOSAL TISSUE ABLATION AND WORKING METHOD OF THE SYSTEM HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 3d overdue
19045323 RECIPROCATING PANEL FOR CAPILLARY HYDRONIC MATS ARANT, HARRY E —
18848885 OPHTHALMIC IMPLANT WITH RESTRICTION MECHANISM ON A DRAINAGE TUBE FOR TREATING GLAUCOMA TOWNSEND, GUY K —
18722682 RNA/DNA ISOLATION KIT WITH HIGH EFFICIENCY SHIAO, YIH-HORNG —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37631
37811
16911
36241
36741
37961
37461

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19045323 RECIPROCATING PANEL FOR CAPILLARY HYDRONIC MATS Solar Assisted Services Pty Ltd. ARANT, HARRY E 3763 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 04, 2025
18848885 OPHTHALMIC IMPLANT WITH RESTRICTION MECHANISM ON A DRAINAGE TUBE FOR TREATING GLAUCOMA Molteno Ophthalmic Ltd. TOWNSEND, GUY K 3781 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2024
18722682 RNA/DNA ISOLATION KIT WITH HIGH EFFICIENCY BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITESI SHIAO, YIH-HORNG 1691 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18704489 COMPUTERIZED WEIGHTED PROBLEM IMPACT SCORE CALCULATION SYSTEM AND A METHOD THEREOF BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITESI OBAID, HAMZEH M 3624 §101§102 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Apr 25, 2024
18533159 LID LIFTER Hbs Hotel & Bau Swiss GmbH LOIKITH, CATHERINE A 3674 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 07, 2023
18276874 NEGATIVE PRESSURE BASED IMAGING AND THERAPEUTIC APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR WELL-CONFINED ABNORMAL MUCOSAL TISSUE ABLATION AND WORKING METHOD OF THE SYSTEM Dokuz Eylul Universitesi HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 3796 §103§112 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Aug 10, 2023
17770282 Steering Apparatus for Object Transporting Vehicles Ezetrolley Pty Lyfd EDWARDS, LOREN C 3746 §102§103 Final Rejection 84d overdue Pending Apr 19, 2022

Managing Crose Law LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Crose Law LLC's patent allowance rate?

87.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Crose Law LLC were allowed, across 395 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Crose Law LLC average before allowance?

3.17 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Crose Law LLC have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month