Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cytiva - Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

14 pending office actions • 4 clients • 14 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

CYTIVA - Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP has 15 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials against 1640 career applications. Its current docket is therefore only one part of a larger historical prosecution record.

The resolved allowance rate is 92.82%, showing a high proportion of allowances among matters that have reached resolution. The average of 4.25 office actions per allowance indicates that successful cases commonly involve repeated examination exchanges before allowance.

For practitioners, the profile suggests meaningful experience in the technology area paired with a comparatively involved prosecution path. The allowance rate supports confidence in eventual outcomes, while the action average highlights the value of budgeting for continued examination and carefully sequenced claim amendments.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1640 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1640
+0.71σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1640
4.2
OAs to Allowance
n=1124
+0.42σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1124
1189 days
Time to Allowance
n=1124
+1.0pp
Interview Lift
n=1640
39.0%
RCE Rate
n=1640
1.2%
Appeal Rate
n=1640

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.1%
§101 Overcome
n=84
79.7%
§102 Overcome
n=591
82.2%
§103 Overcome
n=863
83.0%
§112 Overcome
n=702

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, F01D, C12M
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1640
4
Practitioners
n=1640
410.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1640

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (57%)
4
Medium (29%)
2
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (7%)
§103 only3 (21%)
§112 only2 (14%)
Double-patenting + other1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

12
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
7% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
7% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW 1 59.5% +31.7%
SEIF, DARIUSH 1 70.7% +6.1%
KIPOUROS, HOLLY MICHAELA 1 69.8% +21.3%
INSLER, ELIZABETH 1 67.1% +25.0%
ESPERON, NATHAN GREGORY 1 41.0% +23.3%
MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER 1 77.8% +49.3%
EDWARDS, LYDIA E 1 60.1% +6.0%
BORTOLI, JONATHAN 1 76.4% +40.2%
HASSAN, LIBAN M 1 50.8% +31.1%
HUANG, DAVID Z 1 80.4% +13.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18038742 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING THE INTEGRITY OF A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM USING MASS BALANCING TECHNIQUES HUANG, DAVID Z 27d

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18654163 APPARATUS FOR TRANSPORTING AND INSTALLING A BIOPROCESSING VESSEL BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW —
18585242 LEVELING SYSTEM FOR A BIOREACTOR SYSTEM KIPOUROS, HOLLY MICHAELA —
18388038 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALIGNING A MAGNETIC DRIVE UNIT INSLER, ELIZABETH —
18388028 FLEXIBLE BIOPROCESSING VESSEL AND RIGID SUPPORT STRUCTURE ESPERON, NATHAN GREGORY —
18272249 METHOD IN BIOPROCESS PURIFICATION SYSTEM MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER —
18038803 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IN-LINE MONITORING OF A BIOPROCESS FLUID BORTOLI, JONATHAN —
18038496 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CELL ENRICHMENT, ISOLATION AND FORMULATION SHI, TINGCHEN —
18014370 BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM AND TUBING AND COMPONENT MANAGEMENT APPARATUS FOR A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM BEISNER, WILLIAM H —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18038732 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER FOR A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM HASSAN, LIBAN M 14d
18038742 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING THE INTEGRITY OF A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM USING MASS BALANCING TECHNIQUES HUANG, DAVID Z 27d
18654163 APPARATUS FOR TRANSPORTING AND INSTALLING A BIOPROCESSING VESSEL BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW —
18585242 LEVELING SYSTEM FOR A BIOREACTOR SYSTEM KIPOUROS, HOLLY MICHAELA —
18388038 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALIGNING A MAGNETIC DRIVE UNIT INSLER, ELIZABETH —
18388028 FLEXIBLE BIOPROCESSING VESSEL AND RIGID SUPPORT STRUCTURE ESPERON, NATHAN GREGORY —
18272249 METHOD IN BIOPROCESS PURIFICATION SYSTEM MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER —
18038803 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IN-LINE MONITORING OF A BIOPROCESS FLUID BORTOLI, JONATHAN —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Danaher 10
Pall Technology UK Limited 2
Cytiva 1
KITE PHARMA, INC. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17995
17963
37311
17741
17971
28551
16311
17981

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18654163 APPARATUS FOR TRANSPORTING AND INSTALLING A BIOPROCESSING VESSEL Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW 1799 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 03, 2024
18699939 APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR PACKAGING A BIOPROCESSING BAG Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC SEIF, DARIUSH 3731 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 10, 2024
18585242 LEVELING SYSTEM FOR A BIOREACTOR SYSTEM Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC KIPOUROS, HOLLY MICHAELA 1799 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 23, 2024
18388038 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALIGNING A MAGNETIC DRIVE UNIT Pall Technology UK Limited INSLER, ELIZABETH 1774 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2023
18388028 FLEXIBLE BIOPROCESSING VESSEL AND RIGID SUPPORT STRUCTURE Pall Technology UK Limited ESPERON, NATHAN GREGORY 1799 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2023
18272249 METHOD IN BIOPROCESS PURIFICATION SYSTEM CYTIVA SWEDEN AB MCGUIRK, JOHN SCHUYLER 1796 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 13, 2023
18213361 MULTIFUNCTIONAL BAG PORT AND MATING RING FOR A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC EDWARDS, LYDIA E 1796 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Jun 23, 2023
18038803 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IN-LINE MONITORING OF A BIOPROCESS FLUID Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC BORTOLI, JONATHAN 1797 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 25, 2023
18038732 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER FOR A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC HASSAN, LIBAN M 1799 §112 Final Rejection 14d Pending May 25, 2023
18038742 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING THE INTEGRITY OF A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM USING MASS BALANCING TECHNIQUES Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC HUANG, DAVID Z 2855 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending May 25, 2023
18038858 METHODS FOR CELL ACTIVATION, TRANSDUCTION AND EXPANSION Kite Pharma, Inc. BATES, KEENAN ALEXANDER 1631 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending May 25, 2023
18038496 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CELL ENRICHMENT, ISOLATION AND FORMULATION Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC SHI, TINGCHEN 1796 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 24, 2023
18014370 BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM AND TUBING AND COMPONENT MANAGEMENT APPARATUS FOR A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC BEISNER, WILLIAM H 1799 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 04, 2023
17423202 FLUID HANDLING APPARATUS FOR A BIOPROCESSING SYSTEM Global Life Sciences Solutions Usa LLC KASS, BENJAMIN JOSEPH 1798 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Jul 15, 2021

Managing Cytiva - Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cytiva - Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP's patent allowance rate?

92.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Cytiva - Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP were allowed, across 1,640 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Cytiva - Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP average before allowance?

4.25 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Cytiva - Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleeden, LLP have?

14 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 14 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month