Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
7 pending office actions • 1 client • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dority & Manning, P.A. and Uber Technologies, Inc. handles Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm has 28235 career applications and an 88.31 percent resolved allowance rate. There are 3 pending office actions. The firm averages 3.39 office actions per allowance.
The 3 pending office actions for Uber Technologies, Inc. are managed within the firm's 28235 career applications. The 88.31 percent allowance rate and 3.39 average office actions per allowance serve as benchmarks for these transportation-related matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (29%) |
| §101 + other | 3 (43%) |
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD | 1 | 28.7% | +20.8% |
| TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | 1 | 35.6% | +16.1% |
| OBEID, FAHD A | 1 | 28.2% | +48.5% |
| GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | 1 | 23.2% | +34.4% |
| PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN | 1 | 42.9% | +27.5% |
| SHARPLESS, SAMUEL | 1 | 80.8% | +29.3% |
| ELFERVIG, TAYLOR A | 1 | 62.9% | +38.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18598874 | Systems and Methods for Query Cancellation | SHARPLESS, SAMUEL | 9d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18651077 | Dynamic Data Object Distribution Based on Historical Performance | PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN | 83d |
| 19226737 | Systems and Methods for the Display of Corresponding Content for User-Requested Vehicle Services Using Distributed Electronic Devices | BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD | — |
| 18940228 | REAL-TIME MULTI-ORDER BATCHING USING MULTIPLE COURIERS | TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | — |
| 18916158 | Multimodal Content Feature Extraction for Action Data Structure Generation and Execution | OBEID, FAHD A | — |
| 18890898 | Systems for Routing and Controlling Vehicles for Freight | GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18598874 | Systems and Methods for Query Cancellation | SHARPLESS, SAMUEL | 9d |
| 18651077 | Dynamic Data Object Distribution Based on Historical Performance | PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN | 83d |
| 19226737 | Systems and Methods for the Display of Corresponding Content for User-Requested Vehicle Services Using Distributed Electronic Devices | BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD | — |
| 18940228 | REAL-TIME MULTI-ORDER BATCHING USING MULTIPLE COURIERS | TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | — |
| 18916158 | Multimodal Content Feature Extraction for Action Data Structure Generation and Execution | OBEID, FAHD A | — |
| 18890898 | Systems for Routing and Controlling Vehicles for Freight | GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | — |
| 18594637 | Systems and Methods for Ephemeral Processing of High Cardinality Data | ELFERVIG, TAYLOR A | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Uber Technologies, Inc. | 7 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3621 | 1 |
| 3628 | 1 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| 3688 | 1 |
| 2165 | 1 |
| 2445 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19226737 | Systems and Methods for the Display of Corresponding Content for User-Requested Vehicle Services Using Distributed Electronic Devices | Uber Technologies, Inc. | BUSCH, CHRISTOPHER CONRAD | 3621 | §101§102§103DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 03, 2025 |
| 18940228 | REAL-TIME MULTI-ORDER BATCHING USING MULTIPLE COURIERS | Uber Technologies, Inc. | TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | 3628 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 07, 2024 |
| 18916158 | Multimodal Content Feature Extraction for Action Data Structure Generation and Execution | Uber Technologies, Inc. | OBEID, FAHD A | 3627 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
| 18890898 | Systems for Routing and Controlling Vehicles for Freight | Uber Technologies, Inc. | GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE | 3625 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 20, 2024 |
| 18651077 | Dynamic Data Object Distribution Based on Historical Performance | Uber Technologies, Inc. | PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN | 3688 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 83d | Pending | Apr 30, 2024 |
| 18598874 | Systems and Methods for Query Cancellation | Uber Technologies, Inc. | SHARPLESS, SAMUEL | 2165 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | Mar 07, 2024 |
| 18594637 | Systems and Methods for Ephemeral Processing of High Cardinality Data | Uber Technologies, Inc. | ELFERVIG, TAYLOR A | 2445 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial88.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Dority & Manning, P.A. And Uber Technologies, Inc. were allowed, across 28,426 applications in USPTO records.
3.38 office actions per allowed application on average.
7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.