Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Endurance Law Group, PLC

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

12 pending office actions • 10 clients • 12 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Endurance Law Group, PLC has 12 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 771 career applications. The profile shows an active device-focused practice with a recorded application base.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.3%, and the average office actions per allowance is 2.41. These figures combine a strong allowance outcome with an action measure that helps practitioners evaluate the examination activity associated with successful matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=771 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=771
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=771
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=498
-0.51σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=498
883 days
Time to Allowance
n=498
+8.8pp
Interview Lift
n=771
14.0%
RCE Rate
n=771
3.5%
Appeal Rate
n=771

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

69.8%
§101 Overcome
n=43
76.8%
§102 Overcome
n=181
80.9%
§103 Overcome
n=298
80.2%
§112 Overcome
n=258

Specialization & Scale

A61B, F04C, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
9%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=771
0
Practitioners
n=771
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=771 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (50%)
5
Medium (42%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other1 (8%)
§103 only4 (33%)
§102 only1 (8%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
17% of docket
10
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WU, PAMELA F 1 57.6% +22.5%
ADAMOS, THEODORE V 1 55.4% +44.6%
SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M 1 52.8% +35.2%
AYUB, HINA F 1 85.0% +17.2%
SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA 1 91.7% +10.0%
NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 1 52.7% +40.8%
YOO, JASSON H 1 62.4% +32.9%
EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 1 64.1% +58.5%
HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 1 63.5% +39.9%
KASTURE, DNYANESH G 1 48.0% +26.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18834356 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFOCAL-CHROMATIC LINE DISTANCE MEASUREMENT AYUB, HINA F 76d

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18147913 ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH NON-RADIAL CLAMPING FEATURE HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 89d overdue
18451285 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROVIDING PATRON ACCESS TO MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS YOO, JASSON H 42d overdue
18913455 BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING ADAMOS, THEODORE V —
18897461 AUTONOMOUS FARMING DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M —
18721845 A DYNAMIC WEIGHING SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA —
17887155 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROVIDING CLASS II ROULETTE GAME GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247332 METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTION WITH THIRD PARTIES EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 97d overdue
18147913 ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH NON-RADIAL CLAMPING FEATURE HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 89d overdue
19079181 SURGICAL ACCESS DEVICE HAVING ONBOARD BALLOON VISUALIZATION MODULE WU, PAMELA F 73d overdue
18451285 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROVIDING PATRON ACCESS TO MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS YOO, JASSON H 42d overdue
18403831 SONOTRODE NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 14d
18834356 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFOCAL-CHROMATIC LINE DISTANCE MEASUREMENT AYUB, HINA F 76d
18913455 BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING ADAMOS, THEODORE V —
18897461 AUTONOMOUS FARMING DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37152
37462
37951
36351
36641
28771
28551
37971
36931
37911

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19079181 SURGICAL ACCESS DEVICE HAVING ONBOARD BALLOON VISUALIZATION MODULE Cardiosight, Inc. WU, PAMELA F 3795 §103 Non-Final OA 73d overdue Pending Mar 13, 2025
18913455 BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING Oil Can Rod, LLC ADAMOS, THEODORE V 3635 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18897461 AUTONOMOUS FARMING DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS Mti Technologies Pty Limited SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M 3664 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18834356 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFOCAL-CHROMATIC LINE DISTANCE MEASUREMENT MICRO-EPSILON OPTRONIC GMBH AYUB, HINA F 2877 §103 Non-Final OA 76d Pending Jul 30, 2024
18721845 A DYNAMIC WEIGHING SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE Roberto Impero SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA 2855 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 19, 2024
18403831 SONOTRODE Alma Lasers Ltd. NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 3797 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jan 04, 2024
18451285 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROVIDING PATRON ACCESS TO MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS White Ivory Elephant Technologies Corp. YOO, JASSON H 3715 §101§112 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Aug 17, 2023
18247332 METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTION WITH THIRD PARTIES Moßler GmbH EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 3693 §102 Non-Final OA 97d overdue Pending Mar 30, 2023
18147913 ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH NON-RADIAL CLAMPING FEATURE Mahle International GmbH HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 3746 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 89d overdue Pending Dec 29, 2022
17944004 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH DOMED INVERTER COVER Mahle International GmbH KASTURE, DNYANESH G 3746 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2022
17887155 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROVIDING CLASS II ROULETTE GAME Ags LLC GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 3715 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2022
16789250 MECHANICALLY LOCKING ADJUSTABLE CARDIAC TETHER Cardiosight, Inc. MATTHEWS, CHRISTINE HOPKINS 3791 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2020

Managing Endurance Law Group, PLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Endurance Law Group, PLC's patent allowance rate?

88.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Endurance Law Group, PLC were allowed, across 771 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Endurance Law Group, PLC average before allowance?

2.41 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Endurance Law Group, PLC have?

12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 12 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month