Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

27 pending office actions • 24 clients • 27 examiners • 24 art units • 0 of 27 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

FERGUSON CASE ORR PATERSON LLP has 28 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 1059 career applications. The current docket reflects active work, and the application history provides a basis for evaluating historical prosecution activity.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.15%, with an average of 1.99 office actions per allowance. These figures indicate a high historical allowance share and an average prosecution path involving roughly two office-action stages. They are useful for planning, while the pending applications must still be assessed according to their individual claim and prior-art issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1059 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.2%
Allowance Rate
n=1059
+0.13σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1059
2.0
OAs to Allowance
n=662
-0.96σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=662
768 days
Time to Allowance
n=662
+8.2pp
Interview Lift
n=1059
12.6%
RCE Rate
n=1059
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=1059

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

62.2%
§101 Overcome
n=37
65.0%
§102 Overcome
n=197
64.2%
§103 Overcome
n=260
78.6%
§112 Overcome
n=304

Specialization & Scale

A61B, G10D, B25B
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1059
0
Practitioners
n=1059
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1059 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

27
Total Pending OAs
17
Non-Final OAs
9
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (37%)
11
Medium (41%)
5
Easy (19%)
1
Unknown (4%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (4%)
§103 only10 (37%)
§102 only1 (4%)
§112 only5 (19%)
Multi-statute (no §101)9 (33%)
No statute on record1 (4%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
4% of docket
2
Information Tech
7% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
4
Semiconductors
15% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
41% of docket
9
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

270 h
Manual time on pending OAs
54 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
94 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WIECHERT, QIAWEN W 1 97.9% +2.5%
OSWECKI, ELIZABETH J 1 97.2% +1.5%
SANTOS, MELISSA ADRIANE 1 95.2% +6.5%
CAUDLE, LOGAN WILLIAM 1 — —
SANGHERA, SYMREN K 1 52.0% +15.5%
TORRES, JEFF LENARD DELA VEGA 1 97.1% +3.1%
SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. 1 71.5% +27.7%
DHAKAL, BICKEY 1 84.2% +16.5%
BROWN, MICHAEL J 1 87.9% +8.8%
GOLOVAN, MARK 1 66.7% +50.0%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
35527356 Seat part of chairs WIECHERT, QIAWEN W —
35527083 Shoe OSWECKI, ELIZABETH J —
35526993 Ceiling light SANTOS, MELISSA ADRIANE —

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18605582 MULTI-BALL DEVICE FOR PITCHING TRAINING ARYANPOUR, MITRA 22d
19300149 RIFLE CAUDLE, LOGAN WILLIAM —
18836328 VACUUM INSULATION BOX SANGHERA, SYMREN K —
19183226 FLEXIBLE AND ERGONOMIC DEPLOYABLE CHAIR SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. —
18881509 ELECTROMECHANICAL ACTUATOR FAIL OPERATIONAL SENSING SYSTEM BASED ON TWO ANGULAR SENSORS DHAKAL, BICKEY —
18866489 MACHINES AND METHODS FOR MONITORING PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS BROWN, MICHAEL J —
18856260 SYRINGE ASSEMBLY WITH MARKING ON PLUNGER FOR DOSING GOLOVAN, MARK —
18681438 DEVICE FOR OPTICALLY CONTROLLING A MARK OR A DEFECT ON A CABLE OR AN EXTRUDED BODY OF GREAT LENGHT, CONTROL ASSEMBLY AND METHOD KOLB, NATHANIEL J —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18836328 VACUUM INSULATION BOX SANGHERA, SYMREN K —
19183226 FLEXIBLE AND ERGONOMIC DEPLOYABLE CHAIR SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. —
18881509 ELECTROMECHANICAL ACTUATOR FAIL OPERATIONAL SENSING SYSTEM BASED ON TWO ANGULAR SENSORS DHAKAL, BICKEY —
18856260 SYRINGE ASSEMBLY WITH MARKING ON PLUNGER FOR DOSING GOLOVAN, MARK —

Client Portfolio (24 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
29512
29342
28372
36411
37351
29121
36741
21151
37831
29311

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
35527356 Seat part of chairs Donati S.p.A. WIECHERT, QIAWEN W 2951 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2025
35527083 Shoe Golden Goose S.p.A. OSWECKI, ELIZABETH J 2951 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 13, 2025
35526993 Ceiling light Flos S.p.A. SANTOS, MELISSA ADRIANE 2934 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2025
19300149 RIFLE Fabbrica D'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A. CAUDLE, LOGAN WILLIAM 3641 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 14, 2025
18836328 VACUUM INSULATION BOX Temp Chain Company Ltd. SANGHERA, SYMREN K 3735 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2025
35526002 Shoe sole Tod'S S.p.A. TORRES, JEFF LENARD DELA VEGA 2912 Other Final Rejection — Pending Jul 09, 2025
19183226 FLEXIBLE AND ERGONOMIC DEPLOYABLE CHAIR Posted Up LLC SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. 3674 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
18881509 ELECTROMECHANICAL ACTUATOR FAIL OPERATIONAL SENSING SYSTEM BASED ON TWO ANGULAR SENSORS Société Anonyme Belge De Constructions Aéronautiques, S.A.B.C.A. DHAKAL, BICKEY 2837 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 06, 2025
18866489 MACHINES AND METHODS FOR MONITORING PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS Onsight Technology, Inc. BROWN, MICHAEL J 2115 §101§102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2024
18856260 SYRINGE ASSEMBLY WITH MARKING ON PLUNGER FOR DOSING Sjj Solutions B.V. GOLOVAN, MARK 3783 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
35523490 Table Unifor S.p.A. CALABRESE, MARY ANN 2931 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 08, 2024
35522801 Chandelier Giopato & Coombes S.r.l. MARTINEZ, VANESSA 2934 §112 Final Rejection 92d overdue Pending Oct 04, 2024
35522690 Table lamp Flos S.p.A. DODSON, CHRISTINA MARIE 2933 §103 Non-Final OA 53d overdue Pending Oct 01, 2024
35522927 Platform enclosure for elevators and hoists Takler S.r.l. BENDEL, CARSON JEAN 2964 §112 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2024
18714150 TRAINING SYSTEM Fabbrica D'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A. EGLOFF, PETER RICHARD 3715 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending May 29, 2024
18676422 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC FINGERPRINTING AND ASSOCIATED SECURITY ACTIONS Foxio, LLC CHOY, KA SHAN 2435 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 28, 2024
18711816 SEALING SYSTEM FOR MECHANICAL MEMBERS Development Service S.r.l. KONERU, LAKSHMI S 3675 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2024
18667333 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR AIR QUALITY MONITORING Synthetik Applied Technologies, LLC ALLEN, ANDRE J 2855 §102 Final Rejection — Pending May 17, 2024
18708078 COLD SCARIFICATION AND RECYCLING ASSEMBLY FOR RESTORING A ROAD PAVEMENT, METHODS FOR RESTORING A ROAD SURFACE WITH SUCH ASSEMBLY AND USE OF A MIXTURE OF BITUMEN OR A MIXTURE CONTAINING A HYDROCARBON BINDING AGENT IN SUCH ASSEMBLY Simex Engineering S.R.I. RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE 3671 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2024
18706500 RETRACTOR DEVICE Goebal Schneid - Und Wickelsysteme GmbH RIVERA, WILLIAM ARAUZ 3654 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2024
35520845 Toothpaste dispenser with transparent cap Guala Dispensing S.p.A. MORRIS, KATHERINE ELIZABETH 2923 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18605582 MULTI-BALL DEVICE FOR PITCHING TRAINING Paisleys Pitching LLC ARYANPOUR, MITRA 3711 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Mar 14, 2024
18434670 HYBRID DRUM SHELLS AND RELATED METHODS Drum Workshop, Inc. LOCKETT, KIMBERLY R 2837 §103 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Feb 06, 2024
18681438 DEVICE FOR OPTICALLY CONTROLLING A MARK OR A DEFECT ON A CABLE OR AN EXTRUDED BODY OF GREAT LENGHT, CONTROL ASSEMBLY AND METHOD Lasertecno S.r.l. KOLB, NATHANIEL J 2896 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2024
18556339 TANK BASE FOR A PRESSURE CONTAINER Rattiinox S.r.l. SORKIN, DAVID L 1774 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 19, 2023
18134253 WORK STATION Unifor S.p.A. AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL 3637 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 13, 2023
17707844 LOCKING FORCEPS DEVICE Eca Medical Instruments, Inc. HO, TAN-UYEN THI 3771 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 29, 2022

Managing Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP's patent allowance rate?

88.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP were allowed, across 1,059 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP average before allowance?

1.99 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP have?

27 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 24 clients, before 27 examiners in 24 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month