Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Fitzpatrick Pc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Fitzpatrick PC operates in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, where it has managed 209 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 65.22 percent for these matters. Currently, the firm is responsible for 6 pending office actions, indicating its docket in the life sciences.

The firm's average of 3.51 office actions per allowance reflects the number of responses typically required to resolve examiner rejections. This average, alongside the 65.22 percent resolved allowance rate, characterizes the firm's historical prosecution results. With 209 career applications, the firm has established a specific presence in biotechnology patent law.

Managing 6 pending office actions allows for dedicated attention to the specific technical issues raised by examiners. This historical performance provides a baseline for expected outcomes in this technical field. The firm's 3.51 office actions per allowance metric indicates the level of engagement required to secure grants. Practitioners can rely on these data points when planning long-term prosecution strategies.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=209 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

65.2%
Allowance Rate
n=209
+0.17σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=209
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=90
-0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=90
963 days
Time to Allowance
n=90
+32.0pp
Interview Lift
n=209
21.7%
RCE Rate
n=209
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=209

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

39.1%
§101 Overcome
n=23
63.0%
§102 Overcome
n=54
60.4%
§103 Overcome
n=101
65.3%
§112 Overcome
n=95

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=209
0
Practitioners
n=209
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=209 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only2 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIDWELL, MICHELE M 1 63.9% +18.8%
OLSON, ANDREA STEFFEL 1 62.3% -11.9%
BROWN, SETH RICHARD 1 48.9% +44.3%
RAGHU, GANAPATHIRAM 1 73.6% +26.4%
SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T 1 79.2% +0.9%
SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 1 30.8% +30.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17707892 DYNAMIC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM FOR HEALTHCARE AND TELEHEALTH MANAGEMENT SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 323d overdue
18274138 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO CREATE A WATER-SOLUBLE MIXTURE OF OLIGOSACCHARIDES FOR FACILE CONVERSION TO FERMENTABLE SUGARS RAGHU, GANAPATHIRAM 62d
18290711 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO CONVERT CELLULOSIC MATERIALS INTO SUGAR OLSON, ANDREA STEFFEL —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17707892 DYNAMIC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM FOR HEALTHCARE AND TELEHEALTH MANAGEMENT SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 323d overdue
18555721 INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT DAMPENING DEVICE BROWN, SETH RICHARD 12d
18274138 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO CREATE A WATER-SOLUBLE MIXTURE OF OLIGOSACCHARIDES FOR FACILE CONVERSION TO FERMENTABLE SUGARS RAGHU, GANAPATHIRAM 62d
18673643 SOLID-STATE FILM DISPENSER AND DELIVERY DEVICE THEREFORE KIDWELL, MICHELE M —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37811
16931
37861
16521
17741
36841

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18673643 SOLID-STATE FILM DISPENSER AND DELIVERY DEVICE THEREFORE Clean Saint LLC KIDWELL, MICHELE M 3781 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 24, 2024
18290711 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO CONVERT CELLULOSIC MATERIALS INTO SUGAR Alliance Bioenergy Plus Inc. OLSON, ANDREA STEFFEL 1693 §101§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 19, 2024
18555721 INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT DAMPENING DEVICE Children'S Hospital Of Orange County BROWN, SETH RICHARD 3786 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Oct 16, 2023
18274138 SYSTEM AND METHOD TO CREATE A WATER-SOLUBLE MIXTURE OF OLIGOSACCHARIDES FOR FACILE CONVERSION TO FERMENTABLE SUGARS BLUE BIOFUELS, INC. RAGHU, GANAPATHIRAM 1652 §103§112Other Final Rejection 62d Pending Jul 25, 2023
18226224 SYSTEM TO CONVERT CELLULOSIC MATERIALS INTO SUGAR AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME Alliance Bioenergy Plus Inc. SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T 1774 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2023
17707892 DYNAMIC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM FOR HEALTHCARE AND TELEHEALTH MANAGEMENT Indigenous Health LLC SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 3684 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 323d overdue Pending Mar 29, 2022

Managing Fitzpatrick Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month