Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Gemini Law LLP

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

8 pending office actions • 2 clients • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Gemini Law LLP focuses its practice in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has a career total of 104 applications, which offers a view into their prosecution style in this field. Currently, the firm is managing 7 pending office actions, indicating an active docket relative to their total career volume.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 87.84 percent. This rate is achieved with an average of 4.28 office actions per allowance. This 4.28 average suggests that the firm frequently engages in extensive negotiations or multiple rounds of amendments to secure patent grants in Chemistry & Materials. The 87.84 percent allowance rate shows that this persistent approach is often successful.

With 7 pending office actions and 104 career applications, the firm is a specialized player in its field. The 87.84 percent resolved allowance rate provides a benchmark for their success. Practitioners can look at the 4.28 average office actions per allowance to understand the level of effort and the number of examiner interactions typically required to reach an allowance with this firm.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=104 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.8%
Allowance Rate
n=104
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=104
4.3
OAs to Allowance
n=65
+0.16σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=65
1058 days
Time to Allowance
n=65
+11.3pp
Interview Lift
n=104
47.3%
RCE Rate
n=104
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=104

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
76.2%
§102 Overcome
n=42
73.0%
§103 Overcome
n=63
76.2%
§112 Overcome
n=42

Specialization & Scale

C08G, C09J, B32B
Top CPC Subclasses
55%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=104
5
Practitioners
n=104
20.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=104

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RICE, STEVEN 4 39.3% +43.7%
LEONARD, MICHAEL L 1 63.7% +8.3%
LOUNTOS, GEORGE THEMISTOCLIS 1 57.1% +60.0%
BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH 1 51.8% +45.2%
SHUKLA, KRUPA 1 15.2% +22.6%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17997679 SOLVENT-BASED LAMINATING ADHESIVE RICE, STEVEN 69d
19230980 Retort Adhesive Composition LEONARD, MICHAEL L —
18937946 TWO-COMPONENT SOLVENTLESS ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS FOR ADHESION TO POLYMERIC BARRIER SUBSTRATES RICE, STEVEN —
18890829 METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LOUNTOS, GEORGE THEMISTOCLIS —
17436563 Two-Component Solvent-Based Adhesive Composition SHUKLA, KRUPA —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18251446 Adhesive Composition RICE, STEVEN 66d overdue
18040878 TWO-COMPONENT SOLVENTLESS ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH 27d
17997679 SOLVENT-BASED LAMINATING ADHESIVE RICE, STEVEN 69d
17997681 SOLVENT-BASED LAMINATING ADHESIVE RICE, STEVEN 69d
18937946 TWO-COMPONENT SOLVENTLESS ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS FOR ADHESION TO POLYMERIC BARRIER SUBSTRATES RICE, STEVEN —
18890829 METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LOUNTOS, GEORGE THEMISTOCLIS —
17436563 Two-Component Solvent-Based Adhesive Composition SHUKLA, KRUPA —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Arkema 7
Richter Gedeon Nyrt. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17874
17631
17651

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19230980 Retort Adhesive Composition Arkema France LEONARD, MICHAEL L 1763 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 06, 2025
18937946 TWO-COMPONENT SOLVENTLESS ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS FOR ADHESION TO POLYMERIC BARRIER SUBSTRATES Arkema France RICE, STEVEN §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 05, 2024
18890829 METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF BIOPHARMACEUTICALS Richter Gedeon Nyrt. LOUNTOS, GEORGE THEMISTOCLIS §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18251446 Adhesive Composition Arkema France RICE, STEVEN 1787 §103 Final Rejection 66d overdue Pending May 02, 2023
18040878 TWO-COMPONENT SOLVENTLESS ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME Arkema France BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH 1765 §103DP Non-Final OA 27d Pending Feb 07, 2023
17997679 SOLVENT-BASED LAMINATING ADHESIVE Arkema France RICE, STEVEN 1787 §102§103 Final Rejection 69d Pending Nov 01, 2022
17997681 SOLVENT-BASED LAMINATING ADHESIVE Arkema France RICE, STEVEN 1787 §103 Final Rejection 69d Pending Nov 01, 2022
17436563 Two-Component Solvent-Based Adhesive Composition Arkema France SHUKLA, KRUPA 1787 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 03, 2021

Managing Gemini Law LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month