Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Gordon & Rees LLP

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 7 clients • 10 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

This profile covers Chemistry & Materials and shows 8 pending office actions. The portfolio contains 1722 career applications, giving the current workload a broad historical context.

The resolved allowance rate is 83.86%, and the average is 2.62 office actions per allowance. The resolved data indicates that allowances were obtained in most matters, with more than one office action typically associated with each allowance.

This record can help practitioners frame both expected outcomes and response planning. The allowance rate supplies the outcome measure, while the action average identifies a prosecution path that generally involves repeated examination activity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1722 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.9%
Allowance Rate
n=1722
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1722
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=1013
-0.47σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1013
882 days
Time to Allowance
n=1013
+9.9pp
Interview Lift
n=1722
17.5%
RCE Rate
n=1722
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=1722

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.9%
§101 Overcome
n=83
83.5%
§102 Overcome
n=394
82.7%
§103 Overcome
n=548
84.1%
§112 Overcome
n=441

Specialization & Scale

A63B, B60R, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1722
4
Practitioners
n=1722
430.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1722

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (70%)
3
Medium (30%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only3 (30%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
30% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
1
Semiconductors
10% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1 56.5% +37.1%
BEHA, CAROLINE 1 57.6% +24.0%
WU, MING HAN 1 76.8% +23.7%
PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1 28.4% +27.4%
LAUX, DAVID J 1 65.2% +28.5%
TURNER, SHELBY AUBURN 1 41.5% +42.4%
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 1 81.1% +8.8%
DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 1 60.9% +29.0%
BERTRAM, ERIC D 1 81.3% +12.4%
LENIHAN, JEFFREY S 1 73.0% +17.0%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18117291 NON-PERMANENT INLET FLANGE AND METHOD FOR CUSTOM INSERT DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 77d overdue
18868119 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL REINFORCEMENT LAYER WITH A DATA CARRIER PIZIALI, ANDREW T —
18741489 METHOD FOR DEHYDRATING AN ITEM UTILIZING A MOISTURE REMOVING BAG LAUX, DAVID J —
18502219 HVAC AIR BALANCE AND REPORTING SYSTEM FOR DESIGN, INFECTION CONTROL, CONTAMINATION REMOVAL, AND ENERGY CONSERVATION TURNER, SHELBY AUBURN —
18312852 NEURAL DOSE CALCULATION DIETRICH, JOSEPH M —
18062212 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE BERTRAM, ERIC D —
17989502 HALOGEN-FREE RUBBER COMPOSITIONS AND MEMBRANES LENIHAN, JEFFREY S —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18117291 NON-PERMANENT INLET FLANGE AND METHOD FOR CUSTOM INSERT DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 77d overdue
19256909 PEEL AND STICK TEMPORARY ROOFING MEMBRANE NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L —
18983043 METHOD OF INDUCTION WELDING USING ROOFING MEMBRANES HAVING REDUCED SCRIM DENSITIES BEHA, CAROLINE —
18961434 REMOTE VIRTUAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WU, MING HAN —
18868119 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL REINFORCEMENT LAYER WITH A DATA CARRIER PIZIALI, ANDREW T —
18741489 METHOD FOR DEHYDRATING AN ITEM UTILIZING A MOISTURE REMOVING BAG LAUX, DAVID J —
18502219 HVAC AIR BALANCE AND REPORTING SYSTEM FOR DESIGN, INFECTION CONTROL, CONTAMINATION REMOVAL, AND ENERGY CONSERVATION TURNER, SHELBY AUBURN —
18062212 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE BERTRAM, ERIC D —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37962
17881
17481
26181
37621
28571
37531
17651

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19256909 PEEL AND STICK TEMPORARY ROOFING MEMBRANE Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1788 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 01, 2025
18983043 METHOD OF INDUCTION WELDING USING ROOFING MEMBRANES HAVING REDUCED SCRIM DENSITIES Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC BEHA, CAROLINE 1748 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18961434 REMOTE VIRTUAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Inicio Solutions LLC WU, MING HAN 2618 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18868119 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL REINFORCEMENT LAYER WITH A DATA CARRIER Carlisle Construction Materials GmbH PIZIALI, ANDREW T §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18741489 METHOD FOR DEHYDRATING AN ITEM UTILIZING A MOISTURE REMOVING BAG Kinzie Advanced Polymers, LLC Dba Grove Bags LAUX, DAVID J 3762 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2024
18502219 HVAC AIR BALANCE AND REPORTING SYSTEM FOR DESIGN, INFECTION CONTROL, CONTAMINATION REMOVAL, AND ENERGY CONSERVATION Life Balance Technologies LLC TURNER, SHELBY AUBURN 2857 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2023
18312852 NEURAL DOSE CALCULATION Spiro Medical, Inc. DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 3796 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 05, 2023
18117291 NON-PERMANENT INLET FLANGE AND METHOD FOR CUSTOM INSERT Mastertek Flow Technologies, LLC DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 3753 §103§112 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Mar 03, 2023
18062212 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE Spiro Medical, Inc. BERTRAM, ERIC D 3796 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2022
17989502 HALOGEN-FREE RUBBER COMPOSITIONS AND MEMBRANES Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC LENIHAN, JEFFREY S 1765 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2022

Managing Gordon & Rees LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Gordon & Rees LLP's patent allowance rate?

83.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Gordon & Rees LLP were allowed, across 1,722 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Gordon & Rees LLP average before allowance?

2.62 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Gordon & Rees LLP have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 7 clients, before 10 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month