Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Gordon & Rees LLP

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 4 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

GORDON & REES LLP operates in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has handled 1723 career applications, which provides a foundation for analyzing their historical performance. Currently, the firm is managing 6 pending office actions, indicating a steady current docket of active matters.

The firm's resolved allowance rate stands at 83.91 percent. This outcome is reached with an average of 2.61 office actions per allowance. This 2.61 average suggests an efficient prosecution process, typically requiring multiple rounds of interaction with the patent office to secure a grant. The 83.91 percent allowance rate across 1723 career applications reflects a consistent ability to secure patent rights in the Chemistry & Materials sector.

With 6 pending office actions and 1723 career applications, the firm has an established track record. The 83.91 percent resolved allowance rate serves as a key indicator of their historical success. Practitioners can look at the 2.61 average office actions per allowance to gauge the typical timeline and effort required to reach an allowance with this firm.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1723 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.9%
Allowance Rate
n=1723
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1723
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=1017
-0.47σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1017
882 days
Time to Allowance
n=1017
+9.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1723
17.4%
RCE Rate
n=1723
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=1723

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.9%
§101 Overcome
n=82
83.9%
§102 Overcome
n=392
83.3%
§103 Overcome
n=544
84.3%
§112 Overcome
n=440

Specialization & Scale

A63B, B60R, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1723
4
Practitioners
n=1723
430.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=1723

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (88%)
1
Medium (12%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (88%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1 56.5% +37.2%
WU, MING HAN 1 76.8% +23.6%
GOFF II, JOHN L 1 59.5% +31.3%
FREEMAN, JOHN D 1 45.9% +6.8%
KOWALKOWSKI, FIONA MARGARET 1 100.0% +0.0%
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 1 80.8% +8.6%
DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 1 60.8% +28.9%
LENIHAN, JEFFREY S 1 73.3% +16.8%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18117291 NON-PERMANENT INLET FLANGE AND METHOD FOR CUSTOM INSERT DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 77d overdue
19256909 PEEL AND STICK TEMPORARY ROOFING MEMBRANE NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L —
18901864 SYSTEM FOR PLATELESS MAGNETIC INDUCTION WELDING OF ROOFING MEMBRANES GOFF II, JOHN L —
18822979 THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN ROOFING MEMBRANE FORMULATION WITH IMPROVED INDUCTION WELDING PERFORMANCE FREEMAN, JOHN D —
18761976 TREATING RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS USING SPINAL CORD STIMULATION KOWALKOWSKI, FIONA MARGARET —
18312852 NEURAL DOSE CALCULATION DIETRICH, JOSEPH M —
17989502 HALOGEN-FREE RUBBER COMPOSITIONS AND MEMBRANES LENIHAN, JEFFREY S —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18117291 NON-PERMANENT INLET FLANGE AND METHOD FOR CUSTOM INSERT DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 77d overdue
19256909 PEEL AND STICK TEMPORARY ROOFING MEMBRANE NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L —
18961434 REMOTE VIRTUAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WU, MING HAN —
18901864 SYSTEM FOR PLATELESS MAGNETIC INDUCTION WELDING OF ROOFING MEMBRANES GOFF II, JOHN L —
17989502 HALOGEN-FREE RUBBER COMPOSITIONS AND MEMBRANES LENIHAN, JEFFREY S —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17881
17461
17871
37921
37961
37531
17651

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19256909 PEEL AND STICK TEMPORARY ROOFING MEMBRANE Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1788 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 01, 2025
18961434 REMOTE VIRTUAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Inicio Solutions LLC WU, MING HAN §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18901864 SYSTEM FOR PLATELESS MAGNETIC INDUCTION WELDING OF ROOFING MEMBRANES Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC GOFF II, JOHN L 1746 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18822979 THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN ROOFING MEMBRANE FORMULATION WITH IMPROVED INDUCTION WELDING PERFORMANCE Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC FREEMAN, JOHN D 1787 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 03, 2024
18761976 TREATING RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS USING SPINAL CORD STIMULATION Spiro Medical, Inc. KOWALKOWSKI, FIONA MARGARET 3792 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 02, 2024
18312852 NEURAL DOSE CALCULATION Spiro Medical, Inc. DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 3796 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 05, 2023
18117291 NON-PERMANENT INLET FLANGE AND METHOD FOR CUSTOM INSERT Mastertek Flow Technologies, LLC DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 3753 §103§112 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Mar 03, 2023
17989502 HALOGEN-FREE RUBBER COMPOSITIONS AND MEMBRANES Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC LENIHAN, JEFFREY S 1765 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2022

Managing Gordon & Rees LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month