Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Grant Attorneys AT Law Pllc

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 4 clients • 11 examiners • 9 art units • 1 of 11 (9%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

This profile covers Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and shows 11 pending office actions. The record includes 427 career applications, providing a defined historical base for interpreting the current docket.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.25%, and the average is 4.52 office actions per allowance. The resolved portfolio shows a high allowance rate, but allowances are associated with a comparatively extended sequence of office actions.

For prosecution planning, the data supports favorable outcome expectations with careful attention to examination workload. Practitioners should use the allowance rate to assess results and the action average to plan for continued responses before allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=427 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.2%
Allowance Rate
n=427
+1.22σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=427
4.5
OAs to Allowance
n=338
-0.12σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=338
1347 days
Time to Allowance
n=338
+5.9pp
Interview Lift
n=427
40.0%
RCE Rate
n=427
7.4%
Appeal Rate
n=427

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

85.4%
§101 Overcome
n=239
77.2%
§102 Overcome
n=145
81.3%
§103 Overcome
n=299
81.9%
§112 Overcome
n=177

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G07F, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
66%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=427
1
Practitioners
n=427
427.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=427

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (91%)
1
Medium (9%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only5 (45%)
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
9% of docket
1
Information Tech
9% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
82% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z 1 52.4% +31.4%
POE, KEVIN T 1 39.5% +16.1%
PATEL, AMIT HEMANTKUMAR 1 54.1% +7.3%
SOREY, ROBERT A 1 49.4% +45.3%
HAIDER, FAWAAD 1 50.5% +25.2%
CHANG, EDWARD 1 63.3% +31.9%
KANERVO, VIRPI H 1 47.5% +47.6%
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1 56.5% +37.1%
MAY, ROBERT F 1 73.5% +31.9%
PARK, YONG S 1 25.8% +11.4%

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18492037 PRESSURE SENSITIVE DECAL NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 88d overdue
18353517 RAPID SECURE WIRELESS TRANSACTION PARK, YONG S 58d overdue
18751316 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE REVIEW AND REPORTING OF BIOELECTRICAL DATA SOREY, ROBERT A 36d overdue
18676364 METHOD OF AUTHORIZING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS USING A PHONE NUMBER AND A BIOMETRIC TRAIT HAIDER, FAWAAD 35d
19260739 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING USING UNIVERSAL CHARGEBACK DATABASE SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z —
19212309 BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATED FINANCIAL TRANSFERS POE, KEVIN T —
18811839 PAYMENT SYSTEM UTILIZING A CONSUMER DEVICE FOR APPROVAL PROCESSING PATEL, AMIT HEMANTKUMAR —
18660893 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACCOUNT MIGRATION CHANG, EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18492037 PRESSURE SENSITIVE DECAL NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 88d overdue
18353517 RAPID SECURE WIRELESS TRANSACTION PARK, YONG S 58d overdue
18751316 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE REVIEW AND REPORTING OF BIOELECTRICAL DATA SOREY, ROBERT A 36d overdue
18471060 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING OPTIMAL EMBEDDINGS FOR IDENTIFYING SIMILAR ENTITIES MAY, ROBERT F 28d
18676364 METHOD OF AUTHORIZING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS USING A PHONE NUMBER AND A BIOMETRIC TRAIT HAIDER, FAWAAD 35d
19260739 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING USING UNIVERSAL CHARGEBACK DATABASE SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z —
19212309 BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATED FINANCIAL TRANSFERS POE, KEVIN T —
18660893 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACCOUNT MIGRATION CHANG, EDWARD —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36942
36912
36921
36961
36821
36271
17881
21541
36261

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19260739 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING USING UNIVERSAL CHARGEBACK DATABASE Mastercard International Incorporated SHAIKH, MOHAMMAD Z 3694 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 07, 2025
19212309 BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATED FINANCIAL TRANSFERS Mastercard International Incorporated POE, KEVIN T 3692 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 19, 2025
18811839 PAYMENT SYSTEM UTILIZING A CONSUMER DEVICE FOR APPROVAL PROCESSING Mastercard International Incorporated PATEL, AMIT HEMANTKUMAR 3696 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18751316 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE REVIEW AND REPORTING OF BIOELECTRICAL DATA Healthcare Innovation Technologies, Inc. SOREY, ROBERT A 3682 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 36d overdue Pending Jun 23, 2024
18676364 METHOD OF AUTHORIZING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS USING A PHONE NUMBER AND A BIOMETRIC TRAIT Mastercard International Incorporated HAIDER, FAWAAD 3627 §101 Final Rejection 35d Pending May 28, 2024
18660893 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACCOUNT MIGRATION Vocalink Limited CHANG, EDWARD 3691 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2024
18435388 SYSTEM OF AUTHORIZING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS FOR CONSUMERS WITH DISABILITIES Mastercard International Incorporated KANERVO, VIRPI H 3691 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 07, 2024
18492037 PRESSURE SENSITIVE DECAL Emcee Apparel, LLC NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1788 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 88d overdue Pending Oct 23, 2023
18471060 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING OPTIMAL EMBEDDINGS FOR IDENTIFYING SIMILAR ENTITIES Mastercard International Incorporated MAY, ROBERT F 2154 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Sep 20, 2023
18353517 RAPID SECURE WIRELESS TRANSACTION Mastercard International Incorporated PARK, YONG S 3694 §103§112 Final Rejection 58d overdue AI Ready Jul 17, 2023
18308917 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING A RISK SCORE FOR A NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN TRANSACTED ON A BLOCKCHAIN Mastercard International Incorporated SUMMERS, KIERSTEN V 3626 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 28, 2023

Managing Grant Attorneys AT Law Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Grant Attorneys AT Law Pllc's patent allowance rate?

88.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Grant Attorneys AT Law Pllc were allowed, across 427 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Grant Attorneys AT Law Pllc average before allowance?

4.52 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Grant Attorneys AT Law Pllc have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 11 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month