Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Greenberg & Lieberman, LLC

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 6 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

GREENBERG & LIEBERMAN, LLC focuses its practice in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The firm has managed 915 career applications, providing a foundation for evaluating their performance. Currently, the firm is managing 6 pending office actions, showing a steady level of engagement with the patent office.

The firm's resolved allowance rate stands at 66.92 percent. To achieve these allowances, the firm averages 2.91 office actions per allowance. This 2.91 average suggests that successful applications require multiple rounds of interaction with examiners before being granted in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field. The 66.92 percent allowance rate across 915 career applications provides a benchmark for their success in this technical area.

The 6 pending office actions represent the firm's current active docket. With 915 career applications, the firm has a documented track record. Clients can use the 66.92 percent resolved allowance rate and the 2.91 average office actions per allowance to understand the typical path and success rate of the prosecution process with this firm.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=915 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

66.9%
Allowance Rate
n=915
+0.42σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=915
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=433
-0.34σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=433
944 days
Time to Allowance
n=433
+28.0pp
Interview Lift
n=915
15.0%
RCE Rate
n=915
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=915

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

65.6%
§101 Overcome
n=93
72.4%
§102 Overcome
n=192
72.6%
§103 Overcome
n=362
73.9%
§112 Overcome
n=287

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=915
1
Practitioners
n=915
915.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=915

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
1
Medium (14%)
0
Easy (0%)
2
Unknown (29%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)
No statute on record2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
29% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
43% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ASRES, HERMON 1 80.7% +18.3%
SHAH, BHAVIN D 1 41.7% +25.0%
AIRAPETIAN, MILA 1 72.9% +14.1%
HUI, SAN MING R 1 59.5% +20.1%
SWIFT, CANDICE LEE 1 57.5% +36.0%
CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN 1 21.7% +85.7%
NGUYEN, THONG Q 1 67.8% +12.0%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18671634 AUCTION SYSTEM AND PLATFORM AIRAPETIAN, MILA 68d
17867654 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ILLUMINATING AND DESIGNATING OBJECTS THROUGH USE OF AN ADVANCED PHOTON EMITTER NGUYEN, THONG Q 72d
19169929 BLOCKCHAIN BASED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING TRANSACTION TO TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF VEHICLES SHAH, BHAVIN D —
18583765 Method to Produce Soluble Protein Powder Recovered From Organic Waste SWIFT, CANDICE LEE —
17816287 FACE MASK STRAP RETENTION METHOD AND SYSTEM CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19254149 INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEM AND METHOD ASRES, HERMON 21d
18671634 AUCTION SYSTEM AND PLATFORM AIRAPETIAN, MILA 68d
17867654 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ILLUMINATING AND DESIGNATING OBJECTS THROUGH USE OF AN ADVANCED PHOTON EMITTER NGUYEN, THONG Q 72d
19169929 BLOCKCHAIN BASED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING TRANSACTION TO TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF VEHICLES SHAH, BHAVIN D —
18630064 DEUTERATED PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES HUI, SAN MING R —
18583765 Method to Produce Soluble Protein Powder Recovered From Organic Waste SWIFT, CANDICE LEE —
17816287 FACE MASK STRAP RETENTION METHOD AND SYSTEM CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24491
36941
36881
16271
16571
37851
28721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19254149 INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEM AND METHOD Freename AG ASRES, HERMON 2449 Other Non-Final OA 21d Pending Jun 30, 2025
19169929 BLOCKCHAIN BASED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING TRANSACTION TO TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF VEHICLES Miles Per Hour Inc. SHAH, BHAVIN D 3694 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 03, 2025
18671634 AUCTION SYSTEM AND PLATFORM Iconically, Inc. AIRAPETIAN, MILA 3688 §101§103 Final Rejection 68d Pending May 22, 2024
18630064 DEUTERATED PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF TREATING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES Cardix Therapeutics LLC HUI, SAN MING R 1627 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 09, 2024
18583765 Method to Produce Soluble Protein Powder Recovered From Organic Waste Circular Upcycling SWIFT, CANDICE LEE 1657 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 21, 2024
17816287 FACE MASK STRAP RETENTION METHOD AND SYSTEM Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions, Inc. CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN 3785 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2022
17867654 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ILLUMINATING AND DESIGNATING OBJECTS THROUGH USE OF AN ADVANCED PHOTON EMITTER Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions, Inc. NGUYEN, THONG Q 2872 §103§112 Final Rejection 72d Pending Jul 18, 2022

Managing Greenberg & Lieberman, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month