Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. (Varian)

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=203912 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.6%
Allowance Rate
n=203912
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=203912
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=133308
-0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=133308
1029 days
Time to Allowance
n=133308
+5.3pp
Interview Lift
n=203912
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=203912
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=203912

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.4%
§101 Overcome
n=2976
87.0%
§102 Overcome
n=18368
82.9%
§103 Overcome
n=77991
91.4%
§112 Overcome
n=14406

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, H01L
Top CPC Subclasses
10%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=203912
71
Practitioners
n=203912
2872.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=203912

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
6
Medium (86%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (14%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (86%)
No statute on record1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
43% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W 2 73.2% +16.1%
ARTMAN, THOMAS R 1 84.4% +12.5%
DOWNING, SAVANNAH STARR 1 77.5% +6.0%
LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 1 82.5% +23.7%
DORNA, CARRIE R 1 72.1% +28.1%
HEFFINGTON, JOHN M 1 40.0% +30.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18361190 GEOMETRIC ASPECTS OF RADIATION THERAPY PLANNING AND TREATMENT LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17204657 USE OF MAGNETIC ELEMENTS TO SHAPE AND DEFOCUS CHARGED PARTICLE BEAMS OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W 29d
17710970 BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SYSTEM DORNA, CARRIE R 35d
18971381 HIGH DOSE RATE RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING, SYSTEM AND METHOD ARTMAN, THOMAS R
18361190 GEOMETRIC ASPECTS OF RADIATION THERAPY PLANNING AND TREATMENT LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON
18109608 MATERIAL INSERTS FOR RADIATION THERAPY OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W
15885498 FEEDBACK SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TREATMENT PLANNING HEFFINGTON, JOHN M

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37912
28812
28841
21451

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18971381 HIGH DOSE RATE RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING, SYSTEM AND METHOD Siemens Healthineers International AG ARTMAN, THOMAS R Non-Final OA Pending Dec 06, 2024
18956194 METAL WINDOW ION CHAMBERS AND RADIATION APPARATUSES INCLUDING THE SAME Varian Medical Systems, Inc. DOWNING, SAVANNAH STARR 2884 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 22, 2024
18361190 GEOMETRIC ASPECTS OF RADIATION THERAPY PLANNING AND TREATMENT Varian Medical Systems, Inc. LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 3791 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 28, 2023
18109608 MATERIAL INSERTS FOR RADIATION THERAPY Varian Medical Systems, Inc. OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W 2881 §103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 14, 2023
17710970 BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SYSTEM Varian Medical Systems, Inc. DORNA, CARRIE R 3791 §103 Non-Final OA 35d Pending Mar 31, 2022
17204657 USE OF MAGNETIC ELEMENTS TO SHAPE AND DEFOCUS CHARGED PARTICLE BEAMS Varian Medical Systems, Inc. OSENBAUGH-STEWART, ELIZA W 2881 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Mar 17, 2021
15885498 FEEDBACK SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TREATMENT PLANNING Varian Medical Systems, Inc. HEFFINGTON, JOHN M 2145 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jan 31, 2018

Managing Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. (Varian)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month