Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Head, Johnson, Kachigian & Wilkinson, Pc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

HEAD, JOHNSON, KACHIGIAN & WILKINSON, PC operates in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has a history of 1529 career applications. Currently, the firm is managing 8 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate pct for the firm is 82.23. On average, the firm sees 2.94 office actions per allowance.

Practitioners can evaluate the firm's experience by the 1529 career applications it has handled. The 82.23 resolved allowance rate pct provides a metric for the frequency of success in prosecution. The 2.94 avg office actions per allowance suggests the typical number of interactions with the USPTO before an allowance is granted. With 8 pending office actions, the firm maintains an active volume of cases.

The prosecution history in Chemistry & Materials indicates how the firm navigates the patent office. These metrics reflect the firm's established procedures and its approach to resolving office actions. By examining the relationship between the allowance rate and the average number of office actions, clients can better understand the firm's prosecution style. This data set offers a view of the firm's work and its current obligations at the USPTO.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1529 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.2%
Allowance Rate
n=1529
+0.46σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1529
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=1069
-0.23σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1069
1031 days
Time to Allowance
n=1069
+9.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1529
20.6%
RCE Rate
n=1529
3.4%
Appeal Rate
n=1529

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

64.3%
§101 Overcome
n=70
80.5%
§102 Overcome
n=421
80.2%
§103 Overcome
n=612
84.0%
§112 Overcome
n=512

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, H04N, E21B
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1529
0
Practitioners
n=1529
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1529 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
§102 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALKER, JARED T 1 84.7% +9.8%
DRODGE, JOSEPH W 1 78.3% +38.0%
DONG, LIANG 1 53.2% +32.7%
WEBB, MARGARET G 1 80.0% +8.0%
SMITH, JENNIFER A 1 60.9% +26.9%
VO, TU A 1 61.0% +58.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18587750 WIRELESS POSITIONING SYSTEMS WEBB, MARGARET G 293d overdue

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18112360 NASAL DELIVERY SYSTEM VO, TU A 69d
18904147 SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY CAPTURING, STORING, AND DISPLAYING PHOTOGRAPHS WALKER, JARED T —
18707654 MILLIFLUIDIC CHROMATOGRAPHY PLATE DRODGE, JOSEPH W —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18220695 DUST AND ANTICAKING RESISTANT FERTILIZER SMITH, JENNIFER A 53d overdue
18112360 NASAL DELIVERY SYSTEM VO, TU A 69d
18707654 MILLIFLUIDIC CHROMATOGRAPHY PLATE DRODGE, JOSEPH W —
18703868 IMPROVEMENTS TO UTENSILS FOR USE IN SECURE AREAS DONG, LIANG —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24261
17731
37241
26411
17311
37851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18904147 SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY CAPTURING, STORING, AND DISPLAYING PHOTOGRAPHS TwinMotion, LLC WALKER, JARED T 2426 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2024
18707654 MILLIFLUIDIC CHROMATOGRAPHY PLATE Vulcan Photonics Sdn. Bhd. DRODGE, JOSEPH W 1773 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 06, 2024
18703868 IMPROVEMENTS TO UTENSILS FOR USE IN SECURE AREAS Detectamet Limited DONG, LIANG 3724 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2024
18587750 WIRELESS POSITIONING SYSTEMS Peytec Inc. WEBB, MARGARET G 2641 §102Other Non-Final OA 293d overdue Pending Feb 26, 2024
18220695 DUST AND ANTICAKING RESISTANT FERTILIZER ArrMaz Products Inc. SMITH, JENNIFER A 1731 §103 Final Rejection 53d overdue Pending Jul 11, 2023
18112360 NASAL DELIVERY SYSTEM Suzhou Huafan Chuangshuo Medical Technology Co., Ltd. VO, TU A 3785 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 69d Pending Feb 21, 2023

Managing Head, Johnson, Kachigian & Wilkinson, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Head, Johnson, Kachigian & Wilkinson, Pc's patent allowance rate?

82.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Head, Johnson, Kachigian & Wilkinson, Pc were allowed, across 1,529 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Head, Johnson, Kachigian & Wilkinson, Pc average before allowance?

2.94 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Head, Johnson, Kachigian & Wilkinson, Pc have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month