Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hedman & Costigan, P.C.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 2 clients • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C. has a career history of 2427 applications in Chemistry & Materials. The firm currently manages 3 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate pct is 76.46, representing the success rate for its resolved cases in this technology area. This historical data of 2427 applications provides a significant baseline for evaluating the firm's performance in chemical patent prosecution.

The average office actions per allowance is 2.84. This metric provides a baseline for the amount of negotiation required with examiners to reach an allowance. For practitioners, the 2427 career applications and 76.46 resolved allowance rate pct offer a historical perspective on the firm's performance. The average of 2.84 office actions per allowance is a key factor in estimating the resources needed for patent prosecution. The 3 pending office actions suggest a smaller current workload relative to the firm's historical volume.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2427 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

76.5%
Allowance Rate
n=2427
+0.44σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2427
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=1767
-0.31σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1767
1192 days
Time to Allowance
n=1767
+2.6pp
Interview Lift
n=2427
20.3%
RCE Rate
n=2427
2.1%
Appeal Rate
n=2427

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.6%
§101 Overcome
n=67
74.2%
§102 Overcome
n=457
75.4%
§103 Overcome
n=757
81.0%
§112 Overcome
n=722

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, A61K, F16C
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2427
1
Practitioners
n=2427
2427.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=2427

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PILKINGTON, JAMES 1 70.2% +35.7%
COLGAN, LAUREN ROBINSON 1 69.9% +16.1%
BHATIA, ANSHU 1 84.2% +17.2%
ABU ALI, SHUANGYI 1 45.3% +37.8%
OLADAPO, TAIWO 1 52.9% +11.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18572179 METHOD FOR EVALUATING KNEADING STATE, KNEADER, AND KNEADING ADJUSTMENT METHOD BHATIA, ANSHU —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18684815 SILICON NITRIDE SINTERED BODY, MACHINE PART, AND BEARING COLGAN, LAUREN ROBINSON —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18283200 SEALED ROLLING BEARING PILKINGTON, JAMES 23d overdue
18022163 SILICON NITRIDE SINTERED BODY, ROLLING ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND BEARING ABU ALI, SHUANGYI 16d overdue
17794250 GREASE COMPOSITION AND GREASE-SEALED BEARING OLADAPO, TAIWO 5d overdue
18684815 SILICON NITRIDE SINTERED BODY, MACHINE PART, AND BEARING COLGAN, LAUREN ROBINSON —
18572179 METHOD FOR EVALUATING KNEADING STATE, KNEADER, AND KNEADING ADJUSTMENT METHOD BHATIA, ANSHU —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
NTN 4
Suzuka Engineering Co., Ltd. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36171
17311
17711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18283200 SEALED ROLLING BEARING Ntn Corporation PILKINGTON, JAMES 3617 §103 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Aug 15, 2024
18684815 SILICON NITRIDE SINTERED BODY, MACHINE PART, AND BEARING Ntn Corporation COLGAN, LAUREN ROBINSON §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 19, 2024
18572179 METHOD FOR EVALUATING KNEADING STATE, KNEADER, AND KNEADING ADJUSTMENT METHOD Suzuka Engineering Co., Ltd. BHATIA, ANSHU §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2023
18022163 SILICON NITRIDE SINTERED BODY, ROLLING ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND BEARING Ntn Corporation ABU ALI, SHUANGYI 1731 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Feb 19, 2023
17794250 GREASE COMPOSITION AND GREASE-SEALED BEARING Ntn Corporation OLADAPO, TAIWO 1771 §103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Jul 20, 2022

Managing Hedman & Costigan, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month