Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
13 pending office actions • 4 clients • 12 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
HENNEMAN & ASSOCIATES, PLC has 12 pending office actions in Computing & Software and 759 career applications. The firm has an active software-focused docket supported by a documented application history.
The resolved allowance rate is 87.99%, and the average is 3.23 office actions per allowance. These figures describe the recorded rate of favorable resolution and the examination activity associated with allowances.
For computing and software clients, the profile supports assessing current workload alongside historical prosecution behavior. It does not identify outcomes by software technology, client, or individual application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (8%) |
| §101 + other | 4 (31%) |
| §103 only | 6 (46%) |
| §102 only | 2 (15%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 2 | 46.9% | +24.7% |
| PATEL, MANGLESH M | 1 | 75.1% | +17.9% |
| CAREY, FORREST L | 1 | 56.6% | +55.3% |
| ALMANI, MOHSEN | 1 | 50.1% | +21.9% |
| GURMU, MULUEMEBET | 1 | 80.2% | +17.2% |
| BAYAT, ALI | 1 | 92.4% | +5.9% |
| WEBER, TAMARA L | 1 | 87.3% | +11.9% |
| MCCULLERS, AARON KYLE | 1 | 45.6% | +33.9% |
| LEE, MICHAEL M | 1 | 84.3% | +37.5% |
| PARK, GRACE A | 1 | 76.3% | +17.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18802630 | Hybrid Approach To Data Governance | LEE, MICHAEL M | 99d overdue |
| 18980853 | Flexible Permission Management Framework For Cloud Attached File Systems | GURMU, MULUEMEBET | — |
| 18978908 | A Framework For 3D Object Detection And Depth Prediction From 2D Images | BAYAT, ALI | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18213454 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Valu of Digital Content | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 17d overdue |
| 19029342 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Value Of Digital Content | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 1d overdue |
| 19094449 | Systematic Approach Towards System Identification Based Yaw Rate Estimation With Low-Cost IMU+GPS Units | PATEL, MANGLESH M | — |
| 18952107 | System And Method For Adjusting Vehicle Location | WEBER, TAMARA L | — |
| 18912261 | Dynamic Multi-Modal Mobility Service Platform | MCCULLERS, AARON KYLE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18802630 | Hybrid Approach To Data Governance | LEE, MICHAEL M | 99d overdue |
| 18213454 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Valu of Digital Content | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 17d overdue |
| 19029342 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Value Of Digital Content | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 1d overdue |
| 19094449 | Systematic Approach Towards System Identification Based Yaw Rate Estimation With Low-Cost IMU+GPS Units | PATEL, MANGLESH M | — |
| 19027678 | Systems and Methods for Uploading Streamed Objects to a Cloud Storage System | CAREY, FORREST L | — |
| 19026230 | System And Method For Synchronizing File Systems With Large Namespaces | ALMANI, MOHSEN | — |
| 18980853 | Flexible Permission Management Framework For Cloud Attached File Systems | GURMU, MULUEMEBET | — |
| 18952107 | System And Method For Adjusting Vehicle Location | WEBER, TAMARA L | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Egnyte | 7 |
| Ridecell, Inc. | 4 |
| Thermal Storage Systems | 1 |
| Incisive Software Corporation | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 2 |
| 3665 | 1 |
| 2491 | 1 |
| 2159 | 1 |
| 2163 | 1 |
| 2677 | 1 |
| 3667 | 1 |
| 3663 | 1 |
| 2436 | 1 |
| 2144 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19094449 | Systematic Approach Towards System Identification Based Yaw Rate Estimation With Low-Cost IMU+GPS Units | Ridecell, Inc. | PATEL, MANGLESH M | 3665 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 28, 2025 |
| 19027678 | Systems and Methods for Uploading Streamed Objects to a Cloud Storage System | Egnyte, Inc. | CAREY, FORREST L | 2491 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 19029342 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Value Of Digital Content | Egnyte, Inc. | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 3625 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 19026230 | System And Method For Synchronizing File Systems With Large Namespaces | Egnyte, Inc. | ALMANI, MOHSEN | 2159 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
| 18980853 | Flexible Permission Management Framework For Cloud Attached File Systems | Egnyte, Inc. | GURMU, MULUEMEBET | 2163 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
| 18978908 | A Framework For 3D Object Detection And Depth Prediction From 2D Images | Ridecell, Inc. | BAYAT, ALI | 2677 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 12, 2024 |
| 18952107 | System And Method For Adjusting Vehicle Location | Ridecell, Inc. | WEBER, TAMARA L | 3667 | §101§102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18912261 | Dynamic Multi-Modal Mobility Service Platform | Ridecell, Inc. | MCCULLERS, AARON KYLE | 3663 | §101§102§103DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 10, 2024 |
| 18802630 | Hybrid Approach To Data Governance | Egnyte, Inc. | LEE, MICHAEL M | 2436 | §102Other | Final Rejection | 99d overdue | Pending | Aug 13, 2024 |
| 18738830 | System and Method for Sensitive Content Analysis Prioritization Based on File Metadata | Egnyte, Inc. | PARK, GRACE A | 2144 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 |
| 18658278 | System And Method For Collecting Solar Energy With A Stationary Thermal Storage Device | Thermal Storage Systems | WAN, DEMING | 3762 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 08, 2024 |
| 18487715 | User Interface Overlay System | Incisive Software Corporation | LEGGETT, ANDREA C. | 2171 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Oct 16, 2023 |
| 18213454 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Valu of Digital Content | Egnyte, Inc. | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 3625 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial88.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Henneman & Associates, PLC were allowed, across 759 applications in USPTO records.
3.23 office actions per allowed application on average.
13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 12 examiners in 12 art units.
