Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Grace A Park, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as PARK, GRACE A

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2144 2147 2156 2157 2164

This examiner grants 76% of resolved cases

Analysis

This record covers 575 resolved cases in Tech Center 2100 and Art Unit 2144. The allowance rate is 76.3%, and the median time to allowance is 1216 days. Interview lift is 17.6%, showing a positive association that may assist in clarifying examination issues.

The leading companies are Pure Storage Inc., Intel Corporation, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The leading firms are Alliance IP, LLC, Intel, CANTOR COLBURN LLP, and CKC & Partners Co., LLC. The allowance result is favorable, but the 1216-day median supports setting prosecution milestones well before allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

76.3%
Allow Rate
+21.3% vs TC avg
602
Total Applications
+17.6%
Interview Lift
1216
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 575 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

11.4%
§101 Eligibility
15.8%
§102 Novelty
55.9%
§103 Obviousness
10.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18569632 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ADDRESSING INTENTS USING MACHINE LEARNING Non-Final OA Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
19425066 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INFRASTRUCTURE WITH GPU-INITIATED STORAGE OPERATIONS Final Rejection PURE STORAGE, INC.
19423524 FLASH SYSTEM WITH INTEGRATED LOG ANALYTICS AND ANOMALY DETECTION Final Rejection PURE STORAGE, INC.
18400632 DATA PRIVACY PRESERVATION IN MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
17480168 PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS MODEL MANAGEMENT USING COLLABORATIVE FILTERING Final Rejection Intel Corporation
18024512 LEARNING DEVICE, LEARNING METHOD AND LEARNING PROGRAM Non-Final OA NTT, Inc.
18385873 ENHANCING DOCUMENT METADATA WITH CONTEXTUAL MOLECULAR INTELLIGENCE Non-Final OA MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC
18342764 TRANSFER LEARNING FOR GENERATING A TARGET DOMAIN ANOMALY DETECTION MODEL USING SOURCE DOMAIN DATA Final Rejection International Business Machines Corporation
17953166 DETECTING ROBUSTNESS OF A NEURAL NETWORK Final Rejection NVIDIA Corporation
18394537 APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROVIDING PREDICTIVE INFERENCES RELATED TO A GRAPH REPRESENTATION OF DATA VIA DEEP LEARNING Non-Final OA ATLASSIAN PTY LTD.
18121252 TOPOLOGY EXPLORER FOR MESSAGE-ORIENTED MIDDLEWARE USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES Final Rejection Dell Products L.P.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Grace A Park's allowance rate?

76.3% of resolved applications examined by Grace A Park were allowed (575 resolved cases), compared with 60.2% across Art Unit 2144 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Grace A Park?

This examiner's interview lift is +17.6 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Grace A Park take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Grace A Park took 1,216 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Grace A Park work in?

Grace A Park examines applications in Art Unit 2144 in Tech Center 2100 (Computing & Software).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month