Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Henry Query, P.C.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 4 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

HENRY QUERY, P.C. has 4 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. Its career history includes 14323 applications, giving the profile a large recorded prosecution base. The current docket therefore represents a limited active workload relative to the firm’s full application history.

The resolved allowance rate is 85.38%, and allowed matters have required an average of 2.77 office actions. These figures describe a practice with a substantial record of resolved applications and a measurable examination path for successful cases. Practitioners can use the action average to anticipate response activity while treating the allowance rate as the principal outcome measure.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=14323 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.4%
Allowance Rate
n=14323
+0.47σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=14323
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=8599
-0.40σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=8599
883 days
Time to Allowance
n=8599
+7.3pp
Interview Lift
n=14323
23.9%
RCE Rate
n=14323
1.2%
Appeal Rate
n=14323

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

62.8%
§101 Overcome
n=1120
71.6%
§102 Overcome
n=4458
69.2%
§103 Overcome
n=6686
71.4%
§112 Overcome
n=4982

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H01M, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=14323
4
Practitioners
n=14323
3580.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=14323

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 2 70.0% +31.7%
WOOD, DOUGLAS S 1 78.2% +11.6%
LAMBE, PATRICK F 1 62.5% +29.0%
CUMAR, NATHAN 1 78.8% +14.6%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18572701 Bi-Directional Seal Element and Sealing System CUMAR, NATHAN 70d
18282499 Submersible System for Storing Tanks and Method of Storing Tanks on a Seabed TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J —
17924648 Storage Tank, Transport System Therewith and Method for Operating It TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18572701 Bi-Directional Seal Element and Sealing System CUMAR, NATHAN 70d
18872737 Subsea Christmas Tree Comprising a Control and Battery Module and Related Method LAMBE, PATRICK F 72d
18875140 Subsea Christmas Tree Comprising a Control and Battery Module and Related Method WOOD, DOUGLAS S —
18282499 Submersible System for Storing Tanks and Method of Storing Tanks on a Seabed TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J —
17924648 Storage Tank, Transport System Therewith and Method for Operating It TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
FMC 3
Fmc Technologies Do Brasil Ltda. 1
Deep Purple AS 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36782
36721
36761
36751

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18875140 Subsea Christmas Tree Comprising a Control and Battery Module and Related Method Fmc Kongsberg Subsea AS WOOD, DOUGLAS S 3672 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 14, 2024
18872737 Subsea Christmas Tree Comprising a Control and Battery Module and Related Method Fmc Kongsberg Subsea AS LAMBE, PATRICK F 3676 §103 Non-Final OA 72d Pending Dec 06, 2024
18572701 Bi-Directional Seal Element and Sealing System Fmc Technologies Do Brasil Ltda. CUMAR, NATHAN 3675 §102§103 Final Rejection 70d Pending Dec 20, 2023
18282499 Submersible System for Storing Tanks and Method of Storing Tanks on a Seabed Deep Purple AS TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 3678 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 15, 2023
17924648 Storage Tank, Transport System Therewith and Method for Operating It Fmc Kongsberg Subsea AS TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 3678 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 10, 2022

Managing Henry Query, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Henry Query, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

85.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Henry Query, P.C. were allowed, across 14,323 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Henry Query, P.C. average before allowance?

2.77 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Henry Query, P.C. have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 4 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month